ExlService Holdings, Inc.
ExlService Holdings, Inc. (Form: DEF 14A, Received: 04/28/2017 15:09:15)

 

 

  United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20548

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

 

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐  

 

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as Permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

 

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, If Other Than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

     
No fee required.
   
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
     
  (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

     
  (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

     
  (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

     
  (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

     
  (5)

Total fee paid:

     
   
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
   
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
     
  (1)

Amount previously paid:

     
  (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

     
  (3)

Filing Party:

     
  (4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

(EXL LOGO)  

 

280 Park Avenue, 38 th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 277-7100

 

April 28, 2017

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

On behalf of the board of directors of ExlService Holdings, Inc., we are pleased to invite you to the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held on June 22, 2017 in New York, New York.

 

The Annual Meeting will begin with discussion and voting on the matters set forth on the accompanying Notice of the Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, followed by discussion of other business matters properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

 

Pursuant to rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. On or about April 28, 2017, we will mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Notice”) to each of our stockholders of record and beneficial owners at the close of business on April 26, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting. On the date of mailing of the Internet Notice, all stockholders and beneficial owners will have the ability to access all of the proxy materials on a website referred to in the Internet Notice. These proxy materials will be available free of charge.

 

Even if you choose to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you are encouraged to review the proxy materials and vote your shares in advance of the meeting by Internet or phone. The Internet Notice will contain instructions to allow you to request copies of the proxy materials to be sent to you by mail. Any proxy materials sent to you will include a proxy card that you may use to cast your vote by completing, signing and returning the proxy card by mail (or voting instruction form, if you hold shares through a broker). Your vote is extremely important, and we appreciate you taking the time to vote promptly. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may withdraw your proxy should you wish to vote in person.

 

The board of directors and management look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.

 

Sincerely,  
   
-S- GAREN K. STAGLIN -S- ROHIT KAPOOR
Garen K. Staglin Rohit Kapoor
Chairman Vice Chairman and CEO

 

 

 

 

(EXL LOGO)

 

NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are cordially invited to the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of ExlService Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). The Annual Meeting will be held at the New York offices of the Company, 280 Park Avenue, 38 th Floor, New York, New York 10017 on June 22, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Eastern Time, for the purposes of voting on the following matters:

 

1. the election of three Class II members of the board of directors of the Company for a term of three years each;

 

2. the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2017;

 

3. the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company;

 

4. the determination, on a non-binding advisory basis, of how frequently the stockholders should hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company; and

 

5. the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

If you are a stockholder of record at the close of business on April 26, 2017, you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. A list of stockholders as of the record date will be available for examination for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours, at the Company’s executive offices at 280 Park Avenue, 38 th Floor, New York, New York 10017, for a period of 10 days prior to the date of the Annual Meeting and at the Annual Meeting itself.

 

Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, the Company encourages you to promptly vote and submit your proxy by (i) Internet (by following the instructions provided in the Internet Notice), (ii) by phone (by following the instructions provided in the Internet Notice) or (iii) by requesting that proxy materials be sent to you by mail that will include a proxy card that you can use to vote by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the prepaid postage envelope provided. Voting by proxy will not deprive you of the right to attend the Annual Meeting or to vote your shares in person. You can revoke a proxy at any time before it is exercised by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, by delivering a subsequent proxy or by notifying the inspector of elections in writing of such revocation prior to the Annual Meeting. YOUR SHARES CANNOT BE VOTED UNLESS YOU EITHER (I) VOTE BY USING THE INTERNET, (II) VOTE BY PHONE, (III) REQUEST PROXY MATERIALS BE SENT TO YOU BY MAIL AND THEN USE THE PROXY CARD PROVIDED BY MAIL TO CAST YOUR VOTE BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND RETURNING THE PROXY CARD BY MAIL OR (IV) ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON.

 

  By Order of the Board of Directors
  -S- NANCY SALTZMAN
  Nancy Saltzman
  Executive Vice President,
  General Counsel and Secretary
   
New York, New York  
April 28, 2017  

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  Page
2017 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY 2
   
INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION 7
   
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS 11
   
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 15
   
OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 21
   
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 23
   
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT 39
   
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS 61
   
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS 63
   
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 64
   
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 65
   
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 66
   
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 68
   
PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON HOW FREQUENTLY STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 69
   
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING 70
   
MISCELLANEOUS 71
   
OTHER MATTERS 72

 

 

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

2017 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

Summary

Below is a summary of selected key components of this proxy statement, including information regarding this year’s stockholder meeting, nominees for our Board of Directors, summary of our business, performance highlights and selective executive compensation information. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider prior to submitting your proxy, and you should review the entire proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “2016 Form 10-K”).

 

  

Annual Meeting Information
Time and Date: 9:00 AM (Eastern Time), June 22, 2017
   
Record Date: April 26, 2017
   
Place: ExlService Holdings, Inc.
  280 Park Avenue, 38th Floor
  New York, New York 10017
   
Voting: Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote
   

  

Meeting Agenda, Voting Matters and Recommendations
The Board of Directors recommends a vote for the following proposals:
 
  1. the election of three Class II members of the board of directors of the Company for a term of three years each (page 65);
     
  2. the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2017 (page 66);
     
  3. the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company (page 68);
     
  4. the determination, on a non-binding advisory basis, of how frequently the stockholders should hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company (page 69); and
     
  5. the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
     

 

2  

 

 

Board Nominations
Name
(Year Joined
Board)

Principal Occupation 

Audit
Committee
Compensation Committee Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

David B. Kelso

(July 2006)

 

Independent Director; financial advisor for Kelso Advisory Services ü (GRAPHIC)    

ü  

(Chair)

Som Mittal 

(December 2013)

 

Independent Director; formerly served as president of the National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM)   ü ü

Clyde Ostler 

(December 2007)

 

Independent Director; former Group Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Management Committee member at Wells Fargo & Co.

 

 

ü (GRAPHIC)

(Chair)

 

ü  

 

(GRAPHIC)         Audit committee financial expert under applicable SEC rules and regulations.

 

Our Business

 

We are an operations management and analytics company that helps businesses enhance growth and profitability. Using our proprietary platforms, methodologies and tools we look deeper to help companies improve global operations, enhance data-driven insights, increase customer satisfaction, and manage risk and compliance. We serve our customers in the insurance, healthcare, travel, transportation and logistics, banking and financial services and utilities industries, among others. Headquartered in New York, we have approximately 26,000 professionals in locations throughout the United States, Europe, Asia (primarily India and the Philippines), Latin America, Australia and South Africa.

 

Performance Highlights for 2016

 

Company 3 Year Performance 

Revenue and Segment Information ($ in millions)

  Revenue (Year-over-year growth %)
2014 2015 2016
Insurance Segment  $151.3 (1) $199.9 (32.1%) $206.3 (3.2%)
Healthcare Segment $42.9 $55.2 (28.7%) $68.7 (24.5%)
Travel, Transportation and Logistics Segment $47.5 $62.2 (30.9%) $69.4 (11.6%)
Finance and Accounting Segment $92.0 $78.5 (-14.7%) $79.4 (1.2%)
Analytics $65.6 $122.2 (86.3%) $165.7 (35.6%)
All Other $100.0   $110.5 (10.5%) $96.5 (-12.7%)
Consolidated  $499.3 (1) $628.5 (25.9%) $686.0 (9.1%)

 

 

(1) Includes reimbursement of disentanglement costs for a disclosed client issue, which negatively impacted revenue for this year by $26.3 million. Please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, for additional information regarding this reimbursement.

 

3

 

 

We improved our annual revenues from $628.5 million in fiscal year 2015 to $686.0 million in fiscal year 2016, and also achieved the following:

 

completed the acquisition of Liss Systems Limited, a provider of digital customer acquisition and policy administration solutions for the insurance industry;

completed the acquisition of IQR Consulting Inc., a provider of marketing analytics solutions for the banking industry;

completed the acquisition of Datasource Consulting, LLC, a provider of enterprise management and business intelligence solutions;

entered into a strategic partnership with Automation Anywhere to accelerate robotic process automation initiatives;

won 40 new clients;

received numerous awards and industry recognition; and

launched CareRadius® Version 3.1, our cloud-based total population health platform that integrates data from multiple sources for health plans and practitioners.

 

For more information regarding these and other business highlights, please see page 23 below and the 2016 Form 10-K.

 

The graphs below compare our 1-year, 3-year and 5-year total stockholder return (“TSR”) with that of the companies comprising Nasdaq, S&P 500 and our peer group. As shown in the table, our TSR outperformed all but one of our market benchmarks.

 

(BAR CHART)

 

 

(1) Cumulative growth rate as of December 31, 2016.

(2) Peer group TSR data excludes Solera Holdings, which was taken private in March 2016.

 

2016 Compensation Highlights

 

Named Executive Officers
Name Title
Rohit Kapoor Vice Chairman and CEO
Vishal Chhibbar Executive Vice President and CFO
Pavan Bagai President and Chief Operating Officer
Rembert de Villa Executive Vice President, Head of Healthcare
Nalin Miglani Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

 

4

 

 

2016 Standard Annual Compensation
Compensation
Component

Rohit

Kapoor

Vishal

Chhibbar

Pavan

Bagai

Rembert de

Villa

Nalin

Miglani

Salary $615,027   $411,054 (1) $262,895   $407,514   $407,514  
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation $525,043   $210,992    $200,449   $341,543   $231,104  
Equity Awards $4,005,938   $747,775    $1,335,313   $640,950   $640,950  
Other Compensation (2) $47,129   $108,340    $83,623   $8,340   $8,340  
Total $5,193,137   $1,478,161    $1,882,280   $1,398,347   $1,287,908  

 

 

(1) The amount set forth in the “Salary” row for Mr. Chhibbar includes $11,504 paid in 2016 in lieu of vacation not taken in 2015 in accordance with Indian employment regulations.

(2) For each named executive offer, this category includes, if applicable, his perquisites and personal benefits, vacation payout, changes in pension value, Company-paid life insurance premiums and Company contributions to our 401(k) plan. A detailed discussion of the compensation components for each named executive officer for fiscal year 2016 is provided in the “Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2016” beginning on page 40.

 

On an annual basis, we submit to our stockholders a vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement. We refer to this vote as “say-on-pay”. Please refer to our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, starting on page 23 for a complete description of our 2016 compensation program. Below are a few highlights of our executive compensation:

 

99.7% Say-on-Pay Approval Last Year : At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers for fiscal year 2015. Approximately 99.7% of the votes were in favor of fiscal year 2015 compensation.

 

Annual Bonus Program Based Upon Financial Performance Criteria : Our Compensation Committee approved the continued use of our annual bonus program, which was redesigned in 2014 to be based upon the following performance criteria:

 

Company Wide Metrics – Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) and revenue

Business Line Metrics – Revenues, new client revenues and margin achievement

Individual Metrics – Linked to areas of performance that are unique to each executive

 

Long-Term Equity Incentive Program : We also continued our equity incentive program that we first implemented in 2014, which includes granting a mix of time-vested restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units. The performance-based restricted stock units were comprised of:

 

Relative total stockholder return-linked restricted stock units, and

Revenue-linked restricted stock units.

 

Beginning with the 2016 revenue-linked restricted stock units, we altered our equity incentive grants to remove the banking feature that allowed an executive to earn a portion of the award prior to the vesting date if specific interim performance targets were achieved.

 

5

 

 

2016 Performance : We delivered solid revenue and Adjusted EPS performance in 2016.

 

Annual Incentive Program : As measured under our annual incentive plan, we delivered 99% of our stretch Adjusted EPS target and fell just short of our stretch total revenue performance target achieving 96.2% of target.

 

Equity Incentive Program : This was the third and final performance year for the 2014 performance-based restricted stock units. We achieved 100.1% of the revenue target for the revenue-linked restricted stock units resulting in 100.69% funding of those grants. The Company’s TSR performance was in the 95 th percentile amongst its peer group, resulting in the executives earning 200% of the 2014 relative TSR-linked restricted stock units pursuant to the terms of the original grant. Our solid revenue achievement also resulted in our executives banking one-third of the revenue-linked restricted stock units for the 2015 revenue performance based grants, based on metrics set by the Compensation Committee in advance and under the terms of our equity plan. We removed this banking feature for the 2016 revenue-linked restricted stock units.

 

Compensation Mix:

 

(PIE CHART)  

 

Auditor Matters

 

As a matter of good corporate practice, we are seeking your ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2017. For more information on our auditors, including individual components of 2016 audit fees, see page 66.

 

   

2016

(in thousands)

 
Audit Fees   $ 1,551    
Audit-Related Fees   266    
Tax Fees   44    
All Other Fees   92    
Total   $  1,953    

 

6

 

 

INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION

 

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of ExlService Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“us,” “we,” “our” or the “Company”), of proxies to be used at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the New York offices of the Company, 280 Park Avenue, 38 th Floor, New York, New York, 10017 on June 22, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Eastern Time, and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder of record, the Company furnishes proxy materials via the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Notice”) by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of our proxy materials other than as described herein. Instead, the Internet Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The Internet Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy over the Internet or by phone. If you received an Internet Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting proxy materials included in the Internet Notice.

 

It is anticipated that the Internet Notice will be sent to stockholders on or about April 28, 2017. This proxy statement and the form of proxy relating to the Annual Meeting will be made available via the Internet to stockholders on or prior to the date that the Internet Notice is first sent.

 

Who Can Vote

 

Only stockholders who own shares of our common stock at the close of business on April 26, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting, can vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on April 26, 2017, the record date, we had 33,927,581 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share held as of the record date for the Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.

 

How You Can Vote

 

If your shares are registered directly in your name with Computershare Trust Company, N.A., our transfer agent (which means you are a “stockholder of record”), you can vote your proxy by (i) Internet, (ii) by phone or (iii) by requesting that proxy materials be sent to you by mail that will include a proxy card that you can use to vote by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the prepaid postage envelope provided. Please refer to the specific instructions set forth in the Internet Notice. You will not be able to vote your shares unless you use one of the methods above to designate a proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting.

 

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in the name of a brokerage, bank, trust or other nominee as a custodian (also referred to as shares held in “street name”), your broker, bank, trustee or nominee will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares. In addition to voting by mail, a number of banks and brokerage firms participate in a program provided through Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) that offers telephone and Internet voting options. Votes submitted by telephone or by using the Internet through Broadridge’s program must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on June 21, 2017.

 

7

 

 

Voting at the Annual Meeting . Voting by Internet, phone or mail will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you decide to attend in person. Our board of directors recommends that you vote by Internet, phone or mail as it is not practical for most stockholders to attend the Annual Meeting. If you are a “stockholder of record,” you may vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in “street name,” you must obtain a proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting or your vote at the Annual Meeting will not be counted.

 

Revocation of Proxies 

 

You can revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised in any of the following ways:

 

by voting in person at the Annual Meeting;

 

by submitting written notice of revocation to the inspector of elections prior to the Annual Meeting; or

 

by submitting another properly executed proxy of a later date to the inspector of elections prior to the Annual Meeting.

 

Required Vote; Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

 

Quorum

 

A quorum, which is a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock as of April 26, 2017, must be present, in person or by proxy, to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum is calculated based on the number of shares represented by the stockholders attending the Annual Meeting in person and by their proxy holders. If you indicate an abstention as your voting preference for all matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, your shares will be counted toward a quorum but they will not be voted on any matter.

 

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

 

Under our Fourth Amended and Restated By-Laws (our “by-laws”), directors who are standing for election at the Annual Meeting will be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast (meaning the number of shares voted “for” a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted “against” such nominee) by stockholders in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. If any incumbent nominee for director receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” such election, our by-laws provide that such person shall tender to the board of directors his or her resignation as a director. You may cast your vote in favor of electing all of the nominees as directors, against one or more nominees, or abstain from voting your shares. For purposes of the vote on Proposal 1, abstentions and broker non-votes (as described below) will have no effect on the results of the vote.

 

Other Proposals

 

The ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, the determination of how frequently the stockholders should hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company, and each other item to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting will require the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. You may cast your vote in favor of or against these proposals or you may abstain from voting your shares. For purposes of the vote on Proposals 2 (ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm), 3 (approval of the compensation of our named executive officers), 4 (determination of how frequently the stockholders should hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers), or such other items

 

8

 

 

properly presented and to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, abstentions will have the effect of a vote against these proposals. Broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against Proposals 3 and 4, but because Proposal 2 is a “routine” proposal where brokers have discretionary authority to vote in the absence of instruction, there will be no broker non-votes.

 

If you submit your proxy, but do not mark your voting preference, the proxy holders will vote your shares (i) FOR the election of the nominees for director, (ii) FOR the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, (iii) FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, (iv) FOR holding a non-binding advisory vote every year to approve the compensation of our executive officers, and (v) as described below, in the judgment of the proxy holder on any other matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

 

Shares Held in “Street Name” by a Broker

 

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” by a broker, then your broker, as the record holder of the shares, must vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. If you fail to provide instructions to your broker, under the New York Stock Exchange rules (which apply to brokers even though our shares are listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market), your broker will not be authorized to exercise its discretion and vote your shares on “non-routine” proposals, including the election of directors, approval of the compensation of our named executive officers and approval of how frequently the stockholders should hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. As a result, a “broker non-vote” occurs. However, without your instructions, your broker would have discretionary authority to vote your shares only with respect to “routine” proposals, which at the Annual Meeting is the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Other Matters to Be Acted Upon at the Meeting

 

Our board of directors presently is not aware of any matters, other than those specifically stated in the Notice of Annual Meeting, which are to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. If any matter other than those described in this proxy statement is presented at the Annual Meeting on which a vote may properly be taken, the shares represented by proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting those shares.

 

Adjournments and Postponements

 

Any action on the items of business described above may be considered at the Annual Meeting at the time and on the date specified above or at any time and date to which the Annual Meeting may be properly adjourned or postponed.

 

Solicitation of Proxies

 

We will pay the cost of printing and mailing proxy materials and posting them on the Internet. Upon request, we will reimburse brokers, dealers, banks and trustees, or their nominees, for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of shares of our common stock.

 

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

 

Our Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement and form of proxy card are each available at www.proxyvote.com . You may access these materials and provide your proxy by following the instructions provided in the Internet Notice.

 

9

 

 

Important

 

Please promptly vote and submit your proxy by (i) Internet (by following the instructions provided in the Internet Notice), (ii) by phone (by following the instructions provided in the Internet Notice) or (iii) by requesting that proxy materials be sent to you by mail that will include a proxy card that you can use to vote by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the prepaid postage envelope provided. This will not limit your right to attend or vote at the Annual Meeting. All Annual Meeting attendees may be asked to present valid, government-issued photo identification (federal, state or local), such as a driver’s license or passport, and proof of beneficial ownership if you hold your shares through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, before entering the Annual Meeting. Attendees may be subject to security inspections. Video and audio recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting.

 

If you have any further questions about voting your shares or attending the Annual Meeting, please call our Investor Relations Department at (212) 624-5913.

 

10

 

 

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Our board of directors currently consists of eight directors divided into three classes, with each director serving a three-year term and one class being elected at each year’s annual meeting of stockholders. The current composition of our board of directors is as follows:

 

Board Nominations
 

Class I 

(Term Expires 2019) 

Class II 

(Term Expires 2017) 

Class III 

(Term Expires 2018) 

  Kapoor Minto Kelso Mittal Ostler Kerr Sahney Staglin
High Level of Financial Literacy ü   ü (GRAPHIC)   ü (GRAPHIC) ü ü ü
Executive Leadership & Board Experience ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
International / Global Experience ü ü ü ü ü ü   ü
Operations Management, Analytics and/or Industry Vertical Experience ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü

(IMAGE)   Audit committee financial experts under applicable SEC rules and regulations.

 

The election of our Class II directors will take place at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of the Class II director nominees will serve on our board of directors until our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified in accordance with our by-laws.

 

Board of Directors

 

The names, ages and principal occupations (which have continued for at least the past five years unless otherwise indicated) and other information, including the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that such person should serve as a director of the Company, with respect to each of the nominees and continuing directors are set forth below.

 

Class II Director Nominees (Terms Expiring in 2017)

 

   
(PHOTO OF DAVID B. KELSO)

David B. Kelso —Age: 64—has served as a member of our board of directors since July 2006. Mr. Kelso is a financial advisor for Kelso Advisory Services, a company he started in 2003. Mr. Kelso served as a senior advisor to Inductis, Inc. from June 2004 through June 2006 at which time the firm was acquired by the Company. From September 2001 through September 2003, Mr. Kelso served as Chairman of the Aetna Life Insurance Co. as well as the Executive Vice President, Strategy and Finance and a member of the Office of the Chairman for Aetna, Inc. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Kelso was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Managing Director of the Chubb

 

  

11  

 

 

Corporation. Mr. Kelso currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Sound Shore Fund where he is the lead independent director and Chair of the Audit, Nominating, and Valuation Committees and serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Darden School Foundation of the University of Virginia Darden School of Business. From 2005 to 2010, Mr. Kelso was a member of the Board of Directors of Aspen Holdings Limited. From 2007 to 2015, Mr. Kelso served on the Board of Assurant, Inc. and was a member of its Audit Committee and Finance & Investment Committee. Mr. Kelso’s business experience with Inductis, his management and operating experience at major public companies, his expertise in finance, strategy and investments, and his board and committee service at other global companies led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

 

   
(PHOTO OF SOM MITTAL)

Som Mittal —Age: 65—has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2013.  Mr. Mittal served as President of NASSCOM, a trade body for the IT and business process management industries in India from 2008 through January 2014.  Mr. Mittal has held various corporate leadership roles in the IT industry since 1989, including at companies such as Wipro, Digital India, Compaq and HP. He also has extensive experience in the engineering, manufacturing and automotive industries, having held executive roles with Larsen & Toubro, Escorts and Denso. Mr. Mittal became an Independent Director of Axis Bank (NSE: Axis) in October 2011, Cyient Ltd. (NSE: CYIENT) in April 2014, Tata SIA Airlines in July 2015, and Sheela Foam Pvt. Ltd. (NSE: SFL) in June 2016. He is a former member of the Board of Governors of the Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs. Mr. Mittal has been a committee member with the Indian Prime Minister’s National e-Governance Program and is part of several committees of the Government of India. Besides being an Advisor to several companies he is also deeply associated with education as he is on the Board of Governors of several of them. The Company has concluded, based in part on Mr. Mittal’s business experience as President of NASSCOM and his knowledge of the outsourcing industry, that Mr. Mittal should serve as a director.

 

   
(PHOTO OF CLYDE W. OSTLER)

Clyde W. Ostler —Age: 70—has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2007. At the time of his retirement in 2011, Mr. Ostler was a Group Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo & Co., Vice Chairman of Wells Fargo Bank California NA, and President of Wells Fargo Family Wealth. Mr. Ostler served in a number of capacities during his forty year tenure with Wells Fargo, including Vice Chairman in the Office of the President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Auditor, Head of Retail Branch Banking, Head of Information Technology, Head of Institutional and Personal Investments and Head of Internet Services. Mr. Ostler also served on the Senior Management Committee of Wells Fargo for over twenty-five years. Mr. Ostler has also served on a number of for-profit and non-profit boards of directors. Mr. Ostler was appointed to the board of The McClatchy Company (NYSE: MNI) in March 2013. The Company has concluded, based in part on Mr. Ostler’s business experience through his positions at Wells Fargo & Company that Mr. Ostler should serve as a director.

 

 

12  

 

 

Class III Directors (Terms Expiring in 2018)

 

   
(PHOTO OF DEBORAH KERR)

Deborah Kerr— Age: 45— has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2015. Ms. Kerr is a proven technology leader in the software industry with more than 25 years of diverse management experience. Ms. Kerr has served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Product and Technology Officer at Sabre Corporation (NASDAQ: SABR) from 2013 - 2017. Prior to her appointment at Sabre Corporation, Ms. Kerr served as Executive Vice President, Chief Product and Technology Officer at Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) from 2009 until 2012. Ms. Kerr previously held senior leadership roles with Hewlett-Packard, Peregrine Systems and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. From 2013 to present, Ms. Kerr serves as an Independent Director of D+H Corporation (TSX: DH), which provides technology solutions and products to the financial services industry. She was previously a member of the board of directors of Mitchell International Inc. and was Chair of the Technology Committee. The Company has concluded, based in part on Ms. Kerr’s experience driving business through innovative technology solutions and more than 25 years of diverse management experience that Ms. Kerr should serve as a director.

 

   
(PHOTO OF NITIN SAHNEY)

Nitin Sahney— Age: 54—has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2016. He is a leader in the healthcare industry with over 25 years of experience across all areas of healthcare. In 2016, Mr. Sahney founded PharmaCord, LLC, a company that helps biopharma manufacturers address product access hurdles, where he serves as the Member-Manager and Chief Executive Officer. He also served as Operating Advisor to Clayton Dubilier & Rice funds. Mr. Sahney is the former President and CEO of Omnicare Inc., a former New York Stock Exchange-listed Fortune 500 company in the long-term care and specialty care industries. Prior to Omnicare, Mr. Sahney managed a healthcare investment fund, and was the founder and CEO of RxCrossroads, a specialty pharmaceutical company. He also held a series of leadership positions with Cardinal Healthcare, a global healthcare services and products company. The Company has concluded, based in part on Mr. Sahney’s experience as CEO of Omnicare, Inc. and his expertise in the healthcare industry garnered from more than two decades of experience that he should serve as a director.

 

   
(PHOTO OF GAREN K. STAGLIN) Garen K. Staglin— Age: 72—has served as our Chairman since February 2014 and as a member of our board of directors since June 2005. Mr. Staglin has over 40 years of experience in the financial services and technology industries. From 2001 to 2004 he was Chief Executive Officer of eONE Global LP, an emerging payments company, and from 1993 – 1999 he was CEO of Safelite Auto Glass, a provider of glass claim solutions. Mr. Staglin serves on the boards of directors of several public and private companies and non-profit corporations. In the past six years, Mr. Staglin has served on the public company board of directors of Bottomline Technologies, Inc. and of Solera Holdings, Inc. and is presently serving on the board of SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ: SIVB).  Additional prior public board experience includes First Data Corporation, CyberCash, Inc., and Quick Response Services.  Private board experience includes Specialized Bicycle, NVoice Payments, Profit Velocity Solutions, and Winecountry.com.  Non-profit board experience

 

13  

 

 

includes One Mind, IMHRO, and BringChange2Mind.  The Company has concluded, based in part on Mr. Staglin’s experience in the financial services and technology industries and his past experience as a member of public company boards of directors that Mr. Staglin should serve as a director.

 

Class I Directors (Terms Expiring in 2019)

 

   
(PHOTO OF ROHIT KAPOOR)

Rohit Kapoor— Age: 52—co-founded EXL Inc. in April 1999 and has served as our Vice Chairman and CEO since April 2012 and as a director since November 2002. Mr. Kapoor served as our President and CEO from May 2008 to March 2012, as our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) from November 2002 until June 2005 and from September 2006 to March 2007, as our Chief Operating Officer from June 2007 until April 2008 and as President and CFO of EXL Inc. since August 2000. Prior to founding EXL Inc., Mr. Kapoor served as a business head of Deutsche Bank from July 1999 to July 2000. From 1991 to 2000, Mr. Kapoor served in various capacities at Bank of America in the United States and Asia, including India. Mr. Kapoor was appointed as a member of the board of directors of CA Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: CA) on April 7, 2011 and is an active member of the National Association of Software and Services Companies (“NASSCOM”) BPM Forum. The Company has concluded that in connection with Mr. Kapoor’s experience as a founder and current role as CEO of the Company, he should serve as a director.

 

   
(PHOTO OF ANNE E. MINTO) Anne E. Minto— Age: 63—has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2013. Ms. Minto is a qualified lawyer and member of the Law Society of Scotland. She is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development, the Chartered Institute of Management and the City and Guilds of London Institute. She was Group Director Human Resources and a member of the executive committee at Centrica plc from 2002 until her retirement in 2011. Ms. Minto previously held senior management roles at Shell UK and Smiths Group plc and was Deputy Director-General of the Engineering Employers’ Federation. Based in the UK, Ms. Minto is a non-executive director of Shire plc (NASDAQ: SHPG; LSE: SHP) and a non-executive director of Tate & Lyle plc (LSE: TATE) where she serves as Chairman of the Remuneration Committees of both companies. She is also a non-executive director of the Court of the University of Aberdeen and Vice Chairman of the University of Aberdeen Development Trust. She was awarded an OBE in 2000 for services to the engineering industry in the UK. The Company has concluded, based in part on Ms. Minto’s extensive experience as a member of international company boards and of management in the human resources field, together with her knowledge and experience of the European business and regulatory environment that she should serve as a director.

 

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

14  

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Director Independence

 

Our board of directors has determined that all of the members on our board of directors, other than Mr. Kapoor, meet the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and federal securities laws.

 

Meeting Attendance

 

Our directors are expected to attend all board of directors meetings and meetings of committees on which they serve. Directors are also expected to spend sufficient time and meet as frequently as necessary to discharge their responsibilities properly. Overall, during 2016, our board of directors met seven times. Each member of our board of directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate meetings of our board of directors and the committees on which they served during 2016. It is our policy that all of our directors should attend our Annual Meetings of Stockholders absent exceptional cause. All of the persons who were members of the board of directors at the time of our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended such meeting.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

Our board of directors is currently led by Garen K. Staglin, our Chairman, and Rohit Kapoor, our Vice Chairman and CEO.

 

Our by-laws provide that our Chairman or, in the absence of our Chairman, our Lead Director (if there is a Lead Director serving at such time), or in the absence of both our Chairman and Lead Director, our CEO, shall call meetings of our board of directors to order and shall act as the chairman thereof. In the absence of our Chairman, our Lead Director (if there is a Lead Director serving at such time), and our CEO, a majority of our directors present may elect as chairman of the meeting any director present. Independent directors meet at least quarterly in executive session without any management directors or members of the Company’s management present. The Lead Director or, in the absence of the Lead Director, a director chosen by the directors meeting in executive session, presides at all executive sessions.

 

Consolidating the Vice Chairman and CEO positions allows our CEO to contribute his experience and perspective regarding management and leadership of the Company towards the goals of improved corporate governance and greater management accountability. In addition, the presence of our Chairman ensures that the board can retain sufficient delineation of responsibilities, such that our Chairman and our Vice Chairman and CEO may each successfully and effectively perform and discharge their respective duties and, as a corollary, enhance our prospects for success. The Company will thus benefit from the ability to integrate the collective leadership and corporate governance experience of our Chairman and our Vice Chairman and CEO, while retaining the ability to facilitate the functioning of the board of directors independently of our management and to focus on our commitment to corporate governance.

 

For the foregoing reasons, our board of directors has determined that its leadership structure is appropriate and in the best interests of our stockholders at this time.

 

Majority Voting in Director Elections

 

New for 2017, under our by-laws, directors who are standing for election in an uncontested election are elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast (meaning the number of shares voted “for” a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted “against” such nominee) in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting. If any

 

  15

 

 

incumbent nominee for director in an uncontested election receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” such election, our by-laws provide that such person shall tender to the board of directors his or her resignation as a director. (In contested elections, directors will be elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of votes cast in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.) An uncontested election means an election in which the number of nominees for director is not greater than the number to be elected.

 

Committees

 

Our board of directors currently has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee.

 

Committee Composition (1)
 

Audit Committee

Compensation
Committee
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Committee
David B. Kelso    (GRAPHICS)      (GRAPHICS)   (GRAPHICS) (Chair)
Deborah Kerr (GRAPHICS) (GRAPHICS)  
Anne Minto   (GRAPHICS) (Chair) (GRAPHICS)
Som Mittal   (GRAPHICS) (GRAPHICS)
Clyde Ostler    (GRAPHICS)   (GRAPHICS)  (Chair) (GRAPHICS)  
Nitin Sahney (GRAPHICS)   (GRAPHICS)
Garen K. Staglin   (GRAPHICS) (GRAPHICS)

 

(GRAPHICS)    Audit committee financial expert under applicable SEC rules and regulations.

 

 

(1) Our standing committees consist of independent directors. As such, Mr. Kapoor is not included in the table.

 

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee oversees and assists our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to our accounting and financial reporting processes, including the integrity of the financial statements and other financial information provided by us to our stockholders, the public, stock exchanges and others; our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence; the audit of our financial statements; the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; and the Company’s cyber security program and cyber strategy-related risks.

 

Our Audit Committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention (including termination) and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm, and our independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee also reviews and approves specified related-party transactions as required by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and oversees the Company’s cyber security program and cyber strategy-related risks. The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Our Audit Committee annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter and its own performance. A copy of our Audit Committee charter can be found on our website at www.exlservice.com. Information on our website referred to in this proxy statement does not constitute a part of this proxy statement.

 

  16

 

 

The members of our Audit Committee are appointed by our board of directors. All members of our Audit Committee must also be recommended by our Nominating and Governance Committee. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and experience requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and the federal securities laws for audit committee membership. During 2016, our Audit Committee met six times.

 

Nominating and Governance Committee. Our Nominating and Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors (consistent with criteria approved by our board of directors), selects, or recommends that our board of directors select, candidates for election to our board of directors, develops and recommends to our board of directors Corporate Governance Guidelines that are applicable to us and oversees board of director and management evaluations. A copy of our Nominating and Governance Committee charter can be found on our website at www.exlservice.com.

 

Our Nominating and Governance Committee has a policy, reflected in such committee’s charter, of considering director candidates recommended by our stockholders. Candidate recommendations should be sent to our Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o ExlService Holdings, Inc., 280 Park Avenue, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10017, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates all candidates in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation. Our Nominating and Governance Committee, in making its selection of director candidates, considers the appropriate skills and personal characteristics required in the light of the then-current makeup of our board of directors and in the context of our perceived needs at the time. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers a number of factors in selecting director candidates, including, among others, ethical standards and integrity; independence; diversity of professional and personal backgrounds; skills and experience; other public company directorships; and financial literacy and expertise; communication skills; and ability and willingness to comply with Company policies and procedures.

 

Our Nominating and Governance Committee reviews written and oral information provided by and about candidates and considers any additional criteria it feels is appropriate to ensure that all director nominees possess appropriate skills and experience to serve as a member of our board of directors.

 

Although our Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with regard to diversity of board members, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our board of directors seeks members from diverse professional and personal backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for integrity. This assessment includes an individual’s independence, as well as consideration of diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the board of directors. Our Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and makes recommendations regarding the composition of our board of directors in order to ensure that the board has an appropriate breadth of expertise and its membership consists of persons with sufficiently diverse and independent skill sets and backgrounds. The Nominating and Governance Committee also oversees our director onboarding and training program, which provides new directors with training regarding the Company’s policies and procedures and specific requirements that may be needed based on the director’s committee memberships. Our Nominating and Governance Committee annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Nominating and Governance Committee charter and its own performance.

 

  17

 

 

The members of our Nominating and Governance Committee are appointed by our board of directors. During 2016, our Nominating and Governance Committee met five times. Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee meet the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and federal securities laws.

 

Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee reviews and recommends policies relating to compensation and benefits of our directors, officers and employees and is responsible for approving the compensation of our Vice Chairman and CEO and other executive officers. Our Compensation Committee also reviews, evaluates and makes recommendations to our board of directors with respect to our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans and administers the issuance of awards under our equity incentive plans. Our Compensation Committee charter permits the committee to form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate, provided that the subcommittees are composed entirely of directors who satisfy the applicable independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Any such subcommittee must have a published committee charter.

 

Our Compensation Committee charter also permits the committee to retain advisors, consultants or other professionals to assist the Compensation Committee to evaluate director, Vice Chairman and CEO or other senior executive compensation and to carry out its duties. For 2016, our Compensation Committee retained the services of Frederick W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), a qualified and independent compensation consultant, to aid the Compensation Committee in performing its review of executive compensation. Our Compensation Committee annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Compensation Committee charter and its own performance. Additional information regarding our Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for considering executive compensation are addressed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below. A copy of our Compensation Committee charter can be found on our website at www.exlservice.com.

 

The members of our Compensation Committee are appointed by our board of directors. All new members of our Compensation Committee must be recommended by our Nominating and Governance Committee. Our board of directors has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee meet the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and federal securities laws for compensation committee membership. During 2016, our Compensation Committee met seven times.

 

Risk Oversight

 

Our board of directors provides risk oversight. Our management assists the board in identifying strategic and operating risks that could affect the achievement of our business goals and objectives, assessing the likelihood and potential impact of these risks and proposing courses of action to mitigate and/or respond to these risks. These risks are reviewed and discussed periodically with the full board of directors as part of the business and operating review.

 

Our management is responsible for management of our day-to-day risks, and, because we are exposed to financial risks in multiple areas of our business, day-to-day risk management activities and processes are performed by multiple members of our senior and other management. Our board of directors primarily relies on the Audit Committee for oversight of our risk management and cyber security risk. The Audit Committee regularly reviews and discusses with management our major financial risk and cyber security exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and manage such exposures, including our risk assessment and risk management guidelines and policies. In addition, our management maintains, as part of our disclosure controls and procedures, a separate disclosure committee that, as part of its review of our quarterly and annual reports, helps facilitate understanding by

 

  18

 

 

the Audit Committee and our full board of directors of new or changing risks affecting us. Once a year, the full board receives a report from management on the Company’s readiness and capability to prevent, detect and respond to a cyber-attack.

 

In addition, in February 2017 we implemented our Risk Appetite Guidelines that describe certain categories of risk and qualitative and quantitative thresholds considered by the Company to be consistent with its strategic objectives. These guidelines are designed to serve as a reference in assessing and implementing strategy, and to be actionable by management such that they are meaningful from an operational perspective.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

Ms. Kerr, Ms. Minto, Mr. Mittal, Mr. Ostler and Mr. Staglin are the members of our Compensation Committee.

 

During 2016, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers who serve on our board of directors or Compensation Committee.

 

Other Directorships

 

The Board maintains a practice whereby our directors disclose to the Board any offers to be a director of any other organization, which is then evaluated by the Board for potential business and other conflicts.

 

Code of Conduct and Ethics; Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to our directors, officers and employees and which outlines the high ethical standards that we support and details how our directors, officers and employees should conduct themselves when dealing with fellow employees, clients, suppliers, competitors and the general public. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. A copy of our Code of Conduct and Ethics can be found on our website at www.exlservice.com.

 

Our board of directors has also adopted a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist our board of directors in the exercise of its responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines reflect the commitment of our board of directors to monitor the effectiveness of policy and decision-making, both at the board and senior management levels, and to enhance stockholder value over the long term. A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website at www.exlservice.com.

 

Communications with the Board

 

Stockholders interested in contacting our board of directors, our Chairman or any individual director are invited to do so by writing to:

 

Board of Directors of ExlService Holdings, Inc.

c/o Corporate Secretary

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

280 Park Avenue, 38 th Floor

New York, New York 10017

 

All other stockholder communications addressed to our board of directors will be referred to our Chairman and tracked by our Corporate Secretary. Stockholder communications specifically addressed to a particular director will be referred to that director.

 

  19

 

 

Complaints and concerns relating to our accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters should be communicated to our Audit Committee, which consists solely of non-employee directors. Any such communication may be anonymous and may be reported to our Audit Committee through our General Counsel by writing to:

 

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

ExlService Holdings, Inc.

280 Park Avenue, 38 th Floor

New York, New York 10017

Attn: General Counsel

 

All such concerns will be reviewed under Audit Committee direction and oversight by our General Counsel, our Head of Internal Audit or such other persons as our Audit Committee determines to be appropriate. Confidentiality will be maintained to the fullest extent possible, consistent with the need to conduct an adequate review. Prompt and appropriate corrective action will be taken when and as warranted in the judgment of our Audit Committee. We prepare periodic summary reports of all such communications for our Audit Committee.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC. Officers and directors are required to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file. Based solely on a review of the reports furnished to us, or written representations from reporting persons that all reportable transaction were reported, the Company’s officers, directors and greater than ten percent owners timely filed all reports they were required to file under Section 16(a) with respect to transactions during fiscal year 2016.

 

  20

 

 

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Name

 

Position

 

Biographical Information

Rohit Kapoor
(age 52)
  Vice Chairman and CEO   See section entitled “Our Board of Directors” above.
Pavan Bagai
(age 55)
  President and Chief Operating Officer   Mr. Bagai has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since April 2012, as our Chief Operating Officer from May 2008 to March 2012 and as Vice President, Head of Outsourcing Services of EXL India from June 2006 until April 2008. He previously served as Vice President, Research and Analytics of EXL India from December 2004 to May 2006, as Vice President, Operations of EXL India from November 2003 to November 2004 and as Vice President, Strategic Businesses of EXL India from July 2002 to November 2003. Prior to joining us, Mr. Bagai served in various capacities in several business areas across markets in Europe and Asia, including India, at Bank of America beginning in 1985.
Vikas Bhalla
(age 45)
  Executive Vice President and Head of Insurance   Mr. Bhalla has served as our Executive Vice President and Head of Insurance since January 2014, and as our Head of Outsourcing since November 2009.  He previously served as Vice President, Operations of EXL India from June 2006 to October 2009 and as Vice President, Migrations, Quality and Process Excellence of EXL India from April 2002 to June 2006 and as Director, Quality Initiatives of EXL India from May 2001 to March 2002. From May 1998 to May 2001, Mr. Bhalla served in various capacities at General Electric, including as the Quality Leader and E-Business Leader for GE Plastics India.
Vishal Chhibbar
(age 49)
  Executive Vice President and CFO   Mr. Chhibbar has served as our Executive Vice President and CFO since April 2012 and as our CFO since June 2009. He has over 25 years of professional experience in finance. Prior to joining us, Mr. Chhibbar was with GE Capital in various leadership roles. Since 2005, Mr. Chhibbar has served as the Regional Head, Group Financial Planning for Strategy and Treasury for GE Capital, Australia and New Zealand. In 2004 and 2005, Mr. Chhibbar was Chief Financial Officer for GE Capital, South Korea. From 1998 to 2004, Mr. Chhibbar was the Chief Financial Officer for GE Capital, Indonesia and Malaysia. Mr. Chhibbar is a Chartered Accountant and an Associate Member of CPA, Australia.
Rembert de Villa (age 60)   Executive Vice President, Head of Healthcare   Mr. Villa has served as our Executive Vice President, Head of Healthcare since January 2014 and also as our Chief Strategy Officer from April 2012 to January 2014.  He previously served as our Global Head of Client Management and Chief Strategy Officer from September 2010 to April 2012 and as our Managing Principal and Head of Transformation Services from April 2008 to August 2010. Prior to joining us, Mr. de Villa served as Global Practice Leader, Strategic Services at MasterCard Advisors from December 2005 through April 2008 and as Vice President and Financial Services Practice Leader for North America at Capgemini Ernst & Young from March 2003 to December 2005. Prior to his time at Capgemini Ernst & Young, Mr. de Villa was a Partner at A.T. Kearney’s Global Financial Institutions Group.

 

  21

 

 

Name

 

Position

 

Biographical Information

Nalin Miglani
(age 56)
  Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer   Mr. Miglani has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resource Officer since December 2014.  Mr. Miglani is responsible for the global human resources function at the Company. Prior to joining the Company, he was the Chief HR and Corporate Development Officer for Nutreco, based in Amsterdam, Netherlands, from March 2013 to November 2014.  Mr. Miglani also served as the Chief HR and Communications Officer for Tata Global Beverages Company, London, UK, from June 2008 to February 2013.  In addition, Mr. Miglani held various global and regional HR leadership roles around the world during his career at The Coca-Cola Company and British American Tobacco.
Nancy Saltzman
(age 51)
  Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary   Ms. Saltzman has served as our Executive Vice President and General Counsel since April 2014. Ms. Saltzman also serves as Corporate Secretary of the Company.  In July 2016, Ms. Saltzman was appointed as the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer. Prior to joining us, Ms. Saltzman was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Westcon Group, Inc. from January 2005 to April 2014.  Prior to joining Westcon Group, Inc., Ms. Saltzman was a Senior Associate with the law firm of Dewey Ballantine LLP from October 1998 to April 2000, the Associate General Counsel and Vice President Investor Relations at Chartwell Re Corporation from October 1995 to October 1998 and prior to that an Associate with the law firm of Dewey Ballantine LLP from September 1992 to October 1995.

Nagaraja Srivatsan 

(age 50)

 

  Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer   Mr. Srivatsan joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer in December of 2016. Mr. Srivatsan is responsible for overseeing our sales and marketing, consulting, and strategy functions. Previously, he worked at Cognizant Technology Services beginning is 2002, where he served as Senior Vice President and Venture Partner, working with emerging businesses and ventures in the healthcare and life science industry. Mr. Srivatsan was Senior Vice President of Client Solutions at Silverline Technologies from 2001 to 2002, Chief technology Officer and Executive Vice President of Global Delivery at SeraNova from 1998 to 2001, and a Director at SEI Information Technology from 1992 to 1998.

 

  22

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Named Executive Officers

 

As determined in accordance with SEC rules, our “named executive officers” for 2016 are:

 

Rohit Kapoor, our Vice Chairman and CEO;

Vishal Chhibbar, our Executive Vice President and CFO;

Pavan Bagai, our President and Chief Operating Officer;

Rembert de Villa, our Executive Vice President, Head of Healthcare; and

Nalin Miglani, our Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer.

 

Executive Summary – Business Highlights and Key Compensation Decisions for 2016

 

The Company had a successful 2016 from the perspective of achieving various financial performance goals that drive the creation of stockholder value, but also with respect to making strategic acquisitions, continuing to attain industry recognitions for our client-service, winning new clients, expanding our operations and geographic footprint and achieving strong TSR performance. Our compensation program offers our executives the opportunity to earn annual cash bonuses based on achievement of revenue and Adjusted EPS targets (as described below).  We also granted our executives a mix of time-vested restricted stock units that vest over four years and performance-vested restricted stock units, half of which vest based on revenue achievement over three years and half of which vest based on relative total stockholder return over three years.

 

As a result of our performance, our Compensation Committee funded our bonus pool based on an achievement of approximately 96.2% for the stretch revenue component and 99% for the stretch Adjusted EPS component.  Moreover, our performance resulted in our executives banking one-third of their 2015 revenue-based performance restricted stock units, subject to continued employment through the end of the performance period. For the revenue-based performance restricted stock units granted in fiscal year 2016, we have removed this banking feature, and the revenue-based performance restricted stock units will cliff vest on December 31, 2018 if the revenue target is achieved.

 

2016 Business Highlights

 

We improved our annual revenues from $628.5 million in fiscal year 2015 to $686.0 million in fiscal year 2016 (an increase of over 9%), completed several key acquisitions and entered into a strategic partnership with Automation Anywhere to accelerate robotic process automation initiatives. We won 40 new clients, received numerous awards and industry recognitions and launched CareRadius® Version 3.1, our cloud-based total population health platform that integrates data from multiple sources for health plans and practitioners.

 

Total Stockholder Return

 

The graphs below compare our 1-year, 3-year and 5-year total stockholder return (“TSR”) with that of the companies comprising Nasdaq, S&P 500 and our peer group. As shown in the table, our TSR outperformed all but one of our market benchmarks.

 

  23

 

 

(BAR CHART)  

 

 
(1) Cumulative growth rate as of December 31, 2016.

(2) Peer group TSR data excludes Solera Holdings, which was taken private in March 2016.

 

Acquisitions, Finance and Equity Transactions

 

  Acquired Liss Systems Limited (“Liss”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $5.1 million, and approximately $1.8 million of restricted common stock. Liss is a provider of digital customer acquisition and policy administration solutions for the insurance industry.

 

Acquired IQR Consulting Inc. (“IQR”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $5.1 million, and approximately $1.1 million of restricted stock units. IQR is a provider of marketing analytics solutions for the banking industry.

 

Acquired Datasource Consulting, LLC (“Datasource”) for aggregate consideration of approximately $20.3 million, and approximately $4.5 million of restricted common stock. Datasource is a provider of enterprise management and business intelligence solutions.

 

Awards and Industry Recognition

 

  We continued to receive numerous industry recognitions and awards, pointing to our commitment to innovation and excellence.

 

Clients and Operations

 

  In 2016 we won 40 new clients compared to the 34 new clients we won in 2015.

 

We launched CareRadius® Version 3.1, our cloud-based total population health platform that integrates data from multiple sources for health plans and practitioners.

 

  We entered into a strategic partnership with Automation Anywhere to accelerate robotic process automation initiatives.

 

Summary of Key Compensation Decisions in 2016

 

The following highlights the Compensation Committee’s key compensation decisions in 2016 and with respect to performance for 2016.

 

Say-on-Pay Approval . At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 99.7% of our stockholders approved, on a non-binding advisory basis, and excluding broker non-votes) the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in our annual proxy statement for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. In our Compensation Committee’s review and evaluation of our

 

  24

 

 

    compensation program for 2016, our Compensation Committee viewed the strong support from our stockholders as indicative that our compensation program for our named executive officers was designed and implemented to the satisfaction of the interests of our stockholders.

 

Utilization of Performance Criteria . The Compensation Committee approved the performance criteria of our annual incentive bonus program. The Company-wide performance measures for 2016 were (1) earnings per share, adjusted to remove the after-tax impact of stock-based compensation and the amortization of intangible assets (which we refer to as “Adjusted EPS”) and (2) total revenues. With respect to the performance criteria for our separate business lines, the performance goals continue to focus on the business line’s total revenues, new client revenues and margin achievement. We believe this mix of performance goals streamlines the performance criteria of our annual incentive bonus program and focuses our senior executives’ efforts on performance measures that demonstrate our profitability to stockholders. In addition to Company-wide performance measures and performance criteria for our separate business lines, we included individual performance criteria for each of our named executive officers to further encourage focus on areas of performance that are unique to each executive’s position within the organization.

 

Base Salaries . In April 2016, we implemented modest increases to Messrs. Kapoor’s, Bagai’s, de Villa’s and Miglani’s base salaries. In addition, we implemented an increase to Mr. Chhibbar’s base salary of approximately 29% on account of his relocation from India to the United States as of January 1, 2016.

 

Performance Targets . For 2016, the Compensation Committee established performance targets which were intended to encourage stretch performance. We achieved 99% of our Adjusted EPS target and fell just short of our total revenue performance target (96.2%).

 

Bonuses and Equity Incentives . In 2016, we re-structured the annual incentive bonus program to include personal performance goals for all of our named executive officers to encourage focus on areas of performance that are unique to each executive’s position within the organization. We achieved our annual incentive bonus targets, and we exceeded the 2016 revenue performance targets for each of the 2014 and 2015 and revenue-based restricted stock unit grants. Based upon the revenue performance for each year’s grant relative to the applicable target, (a) our executives earned 100.69% of their 2014 awards out of a maximum of 200% for that year, and (b) banked one-third of their 2015 target awards (subject to continued employment), which is the maximum amount that may be banked in either the first or second year of our three-year program. In addition, the Company’s TSR performance was in the 95 th percentile amongst its peer group, resulting in the executives earning the maximum (200%) of the 2014 relative TSR-linked restricted stock units pursuant to the terms of the original grant.

 

Removed Banking Feature . Beginning with the 2016 revenue-linked restricted stock units, we altered our equity incentive grants to remove the banking feature that allowed an executive to earn a portion of the award prior to the vesting date if specific interim performance targets were achieved.

 

Employment Agreement with Mr. Chhibbar . Effective January 1, 2016, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Chhibbar in connection with his relocation from India to our headquarters in New York. Additional information related to the new employment agreement appears later in this proxy statement.

 

  25

 

 

Key Corporate Governance Features

 

Our compensation programs, practices and policies are reviewed and re-evaluated periodically and are subject to change from time to time. Our executive compensation philosophy is focused on pay for performance and is designed to reflect appropriate governance practices aligned with the needs of our business. Listed below are some of the Company’s more significant practices and policies that were in effect during fiscal 2016, which were adopted to drive performance and to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders.

 

Pay for performance . We link a significant portion of each named executive officer’s total compensation to the achievement of specific performance goals, as described below. Such variable compensation is “at-risk” and not guaranteed, and rewards performance and contributions to both short-term and long-term financial performance of the Company.

 

Appropriate choice and use of peer groups . We have thoughtfully selected a peer group of companies with similar market capitalization or scope of operations to us, to help us review current market practices and design a competitive compensation program. We set total compensation of our executive officers at levels the Compensation Committee believes are appropriate relative to the total compensation paid to similarly situated executive officers of our peer companies, giving consideration to market and other factors as well.

 

Equity compensation best practices . Our equity compensation program prohibits option repricing without stockholder approval. We do not have excessive overhang or dilution from equity grants. Our equity incentives are designed to encourage our executives to maintain a long-term view of stockholder value creation, to encourage retention and to ensure a portion of the award is based on Company performance. Any dividends accrued under our equity awards are held until the recipient vests in the underlying shares or units.

 

Limited perquisites and personal benefits . We provide our named executive officers with only limited perquisites and personal benefits in addition to the regular benefits offered to all employees, and we believe that each perquisite and personal benefit we offer serves an important business purpose. We consider the perquisites and personal benefits that we offer to our executives in India to be customary benefits which allow us to remain competitive for top talent.

 

Independent decision-making . Compensation decisions for our named executive officers are approved by an independent Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee is advised by an independent consultant who reports directly to the Compensation Committee and provides no other services to the Company or management.

 

Risk mitigation . We believe the mix and design of our compensation programs serve to mitigate operational, financial, legal, regulatory, strategic and reputational risks.

 

No tax gross-ups . We do not provide “gross-ups” to any of our named executive officers, including for any excise taxes imposed with respect to Section 280G (change-in-control payments) or Section 409A (nonqualified deferred compensation) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we refer to as the “Code”).

 

Clawback Policy . We maintain a compensation recovery policy that allows the Company to recover compensation (including both cash and/or equity awards) previously paid to one or more officers in the event of a financial restatement caused by noncompliance with reporting requirements that impacts the applicable performance metric if, in the opinion of our Board or Compensation Committee, the identified executive’s misconduct was a material factor causing the restatement.

 

  26

 

 

Stock Ownership Policy . We maintain a stock ownership policy that requires our Chief Executive Officer to maintain stock ownership equal to at least six times his base salary and that requires the other members of our executive committee to maintain stock ownership of at least two times their respective base salaries. We adopted this policy in December of 2014 and our covered executives have five years from its adoption date (or, if later, their hire date) to attain the required stock ownership levels. We maintain a similar stock ownership policy for our non-employee directors that requires directors to maintain stock ownership of at least five times their respective annual retainers.

 

Anti-Hedging and Pledging Restrictions . We maintain a policy that prohibits our officers and directors subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, which includes our executive officers, from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to Company stock directly or indirectly owned by any of them. In addition, under this policy, Reporting Persons are only permitted to pledge shares of our stock that exceed those required to be owned under our Stock Ownership Policy described above.

 

Overview of Compensation Policies and Philosophies

 

We believe that the long-term success of companies that provide outsourcing, transformation and analytics services globally is linked to their ability to recruit, train, motivate and retain employees at every level. There is significant competitive pressure in our industry for qualified managers with a track record of achievement. It is critical that we recruit, train, motivate and retain highly talented individuals at all levels of the organization who are committed to our core values of innovation, collaboration, excellence, integrity and mutual respect. We believe that our executive compensation programs are integral to achieving this end.

 

Our Compensation Committee bases its executive compensation programs on the following objectives, which guide us in establishing all of our compensation programs:

 

Compensation should be based on the level of job responsibility, individual performance and our performance . As employees progress to higher levels in the organization, they are able to more directly affect our results and strategic initiatives, and therefore an increasing proportion of their pay should be linked to our performance and tied to creation of stockholder value. Our programs should deliver top-tier compensation in return for top-tier individual and company performance; conversely, where individual performance and/or our performance falls short of expectations, the programs should deliver lower-tier compensation. In addition, the objectives of pay-for-performance and retention must be balanced. Even in periods of temporary downturns in our performance, the programs should continue to ensure that successful, high-achieving employees remain motivated and committed.

 

Compensation should balance long-term focus that is linked to stockholder value as well as short-term financial objectives . Consistent with this philosophy, equity-based compensation should be higher for persons with higher levels of responsibility and greater influence on long-term results, thereby making a significant portion of their total compensation dependent on long-term stock price appreciation. In addition, compensation should focus management on achieving short-term performance goals in a manner that supports and ensures long-term success and profitability.

 

Compensation should reflect the value of the job in the marketplace . We compete for talent globally. In order to attract and retain a highly skilled workforce, we must remain competitive with the pay of other employers who compete with us for talent in the relevant markets.

 

  27

 

 

Compensation programs should be easy to understand . We believe that all aspects of executive compensation should be clearly, comprehensibly and promptly disclosed to employees in order to effectively motivate them. Employees need to easily understand how their efforts can affect their pay, both directly through individual performance accomplishments, and indirectly through contributing to our achievement of strategic, financial and operational goals. We also believe that compensation for our employees should be administered uniformly across the company and should be administered with clear-cut objectives and performance metrics.

 

Our Compensation Committee’s Processes

 

Our Compensation Committee has established a number of processes to assist it in ensuring that our executive compensation programs are achieving their objectives. Among those are the following:

 

Assessment of Company Performance . Our Compensation Committee uses financial performance measures to determine a significant portion of the payouts under our annual incentive bonus program and equity incentive program. The financial performance measures with respect to our named executive officers’ incentive bonuses and equity incentive awards are largely based on the achievement of Company-wide goals. In addition, the incentive bonuses payable under our annual incentive bonus program to our senior executives who have responsibility for business lines are tied to such business lines’ financial or other performance. These Company-wide and business-line performance measures are established by our Compensation Committee annually at the end of the prior year or the beginning of the year. At the end of the year or performance period, in the case of our equity incentive program, our Compensation Committee reviews and certifies our performance achievement, and considers the appropriateness of adjustments to the performance criteria and calculations of performance achievement.

 

We generally pay bonuses at target when we achieve the established financial measures that are set forth in our annual operating plan and personal performance goals, as described below. These measures reflect targets that are intended to encourage stretch performance.

 

Assessment of Individual Performance . Individual performance has a strong impact on the compensation of some of our employees, including our executive officers. The evaluation of an individual’s performance determines a portion of the payouts for each of our named executive officers made under our incentive bonus program and also influences any changes in base salary.

 

For Messrs. Chhibbar, Bagai, de Villa and Miglani, our Compensation Committee receives a performance assessment and compensation recommendation from our Vice Chairman and CEO. The performance assessments are based on each of our named executive officer’s respective self-evaluations and subsequent performance appraisals conducted by our Vice Chairman and CEO. Our Compensation Committee reviews the performance assessments of these executive officers with our Vice Chairman and CEO, and evaluates the achievement of established objectives by each executive officer and his or her business line (if applicable), as well as the executive officer’s contribution to our performance, leadership accomplishments and overall competence. In determining the numerical performance rating that translates into specific payouts under our incentive bonus program and also influences any changes in base salary, our Compensation Committee may exercise its judgment based on our board of directors’ interactions with such executive officers.

 

  28

 

 

For Mr. Kapoor, our board of directors receives a self-evaluation prepared by Mr. Kapoor and provides feedback to our Chairman. Our Chairman then discusses the consolidated feedback from the board of directors with our Compensation Committee. Our board of directors and Compensation Committee evaluates the self-evaluation and feedback as well as Mr. Kapoor’s performance, leadership accomplishments and overall competence and evaluates the achievement of established objectives.

 

Review of Peer Company Market Data . At the time compensation decisions were made for our U.S.-based and other senior executive officers in 2016, our Compensation Committee reviewed publicly available compensation data for companies that are engaged in business and technology services like us. The Compensation Committee took into account whether the companies had market capitalizations or annual revenues similar to ours, as well as the relevance of their geographic areas. The companies that composed our peer group for 2016 were as follows:

 

Peer Group Companies

Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. HMS Holdings Corp.
Ciber, Inc. Solera Holdings, Inc.
Computer Task Group, Incorporated Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated
Convergys Corporation Syntel Inc.
CSG Systems International, Inc. TeleTech Holdings, Inc.
EPAM Systems, Inc. Virtusa Corporation
Genpact Limited WNS (Holdings) Limited

 

The compensation data for our peer group is compiled directly by FW Cook, the independent consultant to the Compensation Committee. The peer group compensation data was supplemented by global general industry and technology industry survey data. The data from the surveys was scaled to our size by FW Cook based on revenues or corresponding revenue ranges as provided by the surveys. While the Compensation Committee reviewed and considered the data provided by these surveys, it did not consider or review the compensation paid to executives at the component companies included within such surveys and did not use this information or any other data as a benchmark to set executive compensation for fiscal year 2016.

 

Our Compensation Committee uses the compensation data to obtain a general understanding of current market practices, so it can design our executive compensation program to be competitive. Market data is not used exclusively, but rather as a point of reference to draw comparisons and distinctions. The Compensation Committee also takes into account an executive officer’s job responsibilities, performance, qualifications and skills in determining individual compensation levels.

 

Total Compensation Review . Our Compensation Committee reviews compensation information provided by FW Cook in order to evaluate each executive’s base pay, incentive bonus and equity incentives when changes in compensation are considered. Compensation decisions are designed to promote our fundamental business objectives and strategy. Our Compensation Committee periodically reviews related matters such as succession planning and management, evaluation of management performance, changes in the scope of managerial responsibilities, and consideration of the business environment, and considers such matters in making compensation decisions.

 

  29

 

 

Role of the Compensation Committee’s Independent Compensation Consultant . For 2016, the Compensation Committee retained the services of FW Cook, a qualified and independent compensation consultant, to aid the Compensation Committee in performing its duties. The Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant assists in collecting and evaluating external market data regarding executive compensation and performance, selecting peer group companies, reviewing the proxy statement and advising the Compensation Committee on developing trends and best practices in executive compensation, director compensation and equity and incentive plan design. Other than performing these consulting services, FW Cook does not provide other services to us or our executive officers. We have affirmatively determined that no conflict of interest has arisen in connection with the work of FW Cook as compensation consultant for the Compensation Committee.

 

Components of Executive Compensation for 2016

 

For 2016, the compensation of executive officers consisted of the following five primary components:

 

Compensation Component   Description   Objectives
         
Base Salary  

●    Fixed compensation that is reviewed annually and is based on performance, experience, responsibilities, skill set and market value.

 

●    Provide a base level of compensation that corresponds to the job function performed.

●    Attract, retain, reward and motivate qualified and experienced executives.

Annual Incentives  

●    “At-risk” compensation earned based on performance measured against pre-established annual goals.

●    Goals are tailored to each executive’s position.

 

●    Incentivize executives to achieve annual goals that ultimately contribute to long-term company growth and stockholder return.

Long-Term Incentives  

●    “At-risk” compensation in the form of restricted stock unit awards whose value fluctuates according to stockholder value.

●    50% of the award vests based on continued service.

●    50% vests based on achievement of revenue and total stockholder return goals.

 

●    Align executive interests with those of stockholders.

●    Reward continuous service with the company.

●    Incentivize executives to achieve goals that drive company performance over the long-term.

Other Benefits  

●    Broad-based benefits provided to company employees (e.g., health and group insurance), a retirement savings plan and other personal benefits where appropriate.

 

●    Provide a total compensation package that is competitive with the marketplace and addresses unique needs, especially for overseas executives.

Severance and Change in Control Protections  

●    Protect executives during potentially tumultuous corporate transaction.

●    Provide reduced post-employment compensation upon other involuntary terminations. 

 

●    Allow executives to focus on generating stockholder value during a change in control transaction.

●    Provide market-competitive post-employment compensation recognizing executives likely require more time to find subsequent employment.

 

  30

 

 

Compensation Mix

 

Consistent with our compensation philosophy, our compensation program balances base salary, short-term incentive and long-term incentive opportunities provided to our executive officers. The following charts illustrate the mix of target compensation components for the Vice Chairman and CEO and the other named executive officers during the 2016 fiscal year. We have excluded the restricted stock units attributable to the 2014 and 2015 fiscal year annual incentive programs as those units do not relate to our fiscal year 2016 compensation program.

 

As illustrated by the charts below, the majority of compensation that may be earned by our named executive officers is tied to the achievement of financial performance metrics (annual performance bonuses and PRSUs) or fluctuates with the underlying value of our common stock (RSUs).

 

(PIE CHART)

 

Base Salary

 

As discussed above, we provide our executive officers fixed compensation commensurate with their performance, experience, responsibilities, skill set and market value. This attracts and retains an appropriate caliber of talent for the position and provides a base wage that is not subject to our performance risk. In setting base salaries for 2016, our Compensation Committee considered:

 

Individual Performance Ø   The degree to which the executive met and exceeded expectations.
     
Market Data Ø   Geographical and market data to test reasonableness of compensation.
     
Overall Compensation Mix Ø Senior employees should have a greater portion of their compensation tied to increasing stockholder value.

 

31

 

 

Upon completing its review and as shown in the table below, the Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to change Mr. Kapoor’s base salary in recognition of his many individual accomplishments and the Company’s performance and to increase Mr. Chhibbar’s base salary due to his relocation from India to New York, his individual contributions and the Company’s performance. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined to increase the base salaries of Messrs. Bagai, de Villa and Miglani due to their individual contributions and the Company’s performance. The fixed compensation paid to Mr. Bagai is paid in Indian Rupees and we have included the percentage increase with respect to his fixed compensation in his home currency (INR). Further, this amount covers not only base salary for Mr. Bagai, but also amounts available as a travel allowance, an automobile allowance, a housing allowance, a medical allowance and a cash supplementary allowance, consistent with compensation practices in India.

 

Name

2015 Base Salary /
Annual Fixed
Compensation

(Effective April 1, 2015)

 

2016 Base Salary /
Annual Fixed
Compensation

(Effective April 1, 2016)

 

% Increase /
Decrease

Rohit Kapoor $ 600,000 (1)   $ 620,000     3.3%
Vishal Chhibbar $309,376   $400,000 (2)   29.3%
Pavan Bagai $337,934   $358,646 (3)  

   6.1%

        (8.0% INR)

Nalin Miglani $400,000   $410,000     2.5%
Rembert de Villa $ 400,000   $410,000     2.5%

 

 

(1) Mr. Kapoor’s base salary, along with his employment agreement, became effective January 1, 2015.
(2) Mr. Chhibbar’s base salary, along with his employment agreement, became effective January 1, 2016 as a result of his relocation to the United States.
(3) The exchange rate used for the annual fixed compensation conversion from Indian rupees to U.S. dollars for Mr. Bagai was 64.13, which was the exchange rate on January 1, 2016.

 

Incentive Bonus

 

We have established an annual incentive bonus program in order to align our executive officers’ goals with our performance targets for the current year and to encourage meaningful contributions to our future financial performance. Our Compensation Committee approved the framework of our incentive bonus program in December 2015 for the year 2016 for bonuses payable in respect of 2016 performance. Under the program, bonus target amounts, expressed as a percentage of base salary or annual fixed compensation, are established for participants at the beginning of each year unless their employment agreements contain different terms. Funding of potential bonus payouts for the year are determined by our financial results for the year relative to predetermined performance measures, and may be increased or decreased depending upon the executive’s individual performance against his performance goals. If our performance falls short of target, our aggregate funding of the annual cash bonus incentive pool declines. If we do not achieve a minimum threshold for the established financial performance objectives, then the bonus pool is not funded for that particular objective. At the end of the performance period, our Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust an award payout from the amount yielded by the formula.

 

32

 

 

Our Compensation Committee considered the following when establishing the awards for 2016:

 

Bonus Targets . Bonus targets were established based on job responsibilities and comparable market data. Our objective was to set bonus targets such that total annual cash compensation was within the broad middle range of market data and a substantial portion of that compensation was linked to our performance. Consistent with our executive compensation policy, individuals with greater job responsibilities had a greater proportion of their total compensation tied to our performance. During 2016, our Compensation Committee established the following bonus targets (expressed as a percentage of base salary or annual fixed compensation) as well as maximum bonus targets for each named executive officer.

 

Name

Bonus Target

Bonus Maximum

Rohit Kapoor 100% of base salary 200% of base salary
Vishal Chhibbar 60% of base salary 120% of base salary
Pavan Bagai 75% of annual fixed compensation 150% of annual fixed compensation
Rembert de Villa 75% of base salary 150% of base salary
Nalin Miglani 60% of base salary 120% of base salary

 

Annual Bonuses Exclusively Denominated in Cash. The Committee believes cash bonuses align with market compensation practices and make the Company’s overall compensation program more competitive. The long-term retention and performance features associated with equity grants continue to be an important part of the Company’s compensation mix, as described below.

 

Performance Measures . Our executives were eligible to earn annual bonuses based on their achievement of company-wide performance metrics, business line or other company performance metrics and individual performance, as described in the tables below.

 

Name

Company-Wide
Performance (1)

Individual
Performance

Business Line or Other
Company Performance

Rohit Kapoor  65% 15% 20%
Vishal Chhibbar  60% 20% 20%
Pavan Bagai  65% 15% 20%
Rembert de Villa  40% 20% 40%
Nalin Miglani  60% 20% 20%

 

 

(1) Based 50% on the Company’s Adjusted EPS goal and 50% on the Company’s revenue goal, for all employees whose incentive bonus is linked to Company-wide financial performance, including our named executive officers. The Company-wide performance component for Messrs. Kapoor and Bagai was reduced from 80% in 2015 to 65% for 2016.

 

Historically, the Compensation Committee has based annual bonus opportunities for Messrs. Kapoor and Bagai on the Company’s achievement of Adjusted EPS and revenue goals.  As part of the Compensation Committee’s continuous evaluation of the Company’s compensation program, it determined to modify Messrs. Kapoor’s and Bagia’s bonus opportunities in 2016 to bring their incentives more in line with those offered to our other Named Executive Officers.  As a result, for 2016, the Compensation Committee believed Messrs. Kapoor’s and Bagai’s annual bonus should be 65% based on the Company’s Adjusted EPS and revenues goals, 15% based on individual performance, and 20% based on the aggregated performance of all Business Units Revenue and Adjusted EPS due to the nature of their positions as Vice Chairman and CEO and President and Chief Operating

 

33

 

 

Officer, respectively. The Committee believed it was important to set the business line and other Company performance goals as well as the individual performance goals described above for all named executive officers to ensure the executives were properly focused on both the Company’s Adjusted EPS and revenue goals, aggregate of business units performance on revenue and Adjusted EPS goals and other areas of performance that are unique to their positions within the organization. The Compensation Committee believes achievement of these performance metrics will drive our business and, in turn, lead to increased stockholder value.

 

Determination of Financial Performance Achievement . In 2016, the portion of incentive bonus payments that were subject to financial performance measures could have ranged from zero to 200% of target depending on the achievement of performance goals, as follows:

 

Adjusted EPS Goals

 

Revenue Goals

% of Adjusted EPS
Achieved Compared to
Target Goal
% of Target Portion
Funded
  % of Revenues
Achieved Compared
to Target Goal
% of Target Portion
Funded
Less than 90%  0%   Less than 90%  0%
At 90% 25%   At 90% 25%
From 90% to 100% Linear interpolation from 25% to 100%   From 90% to 100% Linear interpolation from 25% to 100%
At 100% 100%   At 100% 100%
From 100% to 110% Linear interpolation from 100% to 200%   From 100% to 110% Linear interpolation from 100% to 200%
Above 110% 200%   Above 110% 200%

 

In 2016, our Compensation Committee established an Adjusted EPS target of $2.35 and a stretch revenue target of $715 million. Based on our performance during the 2016 fiscal year, we achieved 99% of our Adjusted EPS target, and 96.2% of our stretch revenue target.

 

The bonus pool funding for employees whose bonuses are tied to the performance of specific business lines is determined by targets established for such businesses by our Compensation Committee.

 

Individual Performance Measures . As discussed above, each of our named executive officers earns a portion of his respective annual incentive bonuses based on the achievement of individual performance measures. These goals are designed to balance the attention of our named executive officers between the achievement of near-term objectives that improve specific processes or performance metrics and long-term objectives for us. While some of the goals are subjective, other goals, such as client and employee satisfaction metrics, are capable of objective measurement. The individual performance measures are generally based on strategic performance indicators such as improving sales productivity, strengthening our sales effectiveness, supporting inorganic growth through mergers and acquisitions, improving recruitment capabilities, enhancing market recognition, advancing our technological and automation capabilities and achieving revenue growth targets within specific areas.

 

34

 

 

Determination of Individual Performance Achievement.

 

Mr. Kapoor made performance assessments and compensation recommendations for Messrs. Chhibbar, Bagai, de Villa, and Miglani and our Compensation Committee approved the recommendations after reviewing similar considerations for such named executive officers. For Mr. Chhibbar, our Compensation Committee noted his role in stewarding the finance function, driving automation in review processes, developing investor relations, and growing the finance and accounting business. For Mr. Bagai, our Compensation Committee noted his contribution in leading the delivery organization, improving the NPS score, and driving cost efficiencies as well as his role in growing the analytics business. For Mr. de Villa, our Compensation Committee noted his contribution in growing the healthcare business and role in building capabilities in the healthcare business for future growth. For Mr. Miglani, our Compensation Committee noted his contribution in building sales and marketing capabilities, developing a performance management framework, continuing the effort of instilling a strong sense of purpose and values, and significantly enhancing the leadership talent. For Mr. Kapoor, the Compensation Committee noted his contribution in building our sales capability, instilling a renewed sense of purpose and values in the large employee base, winning major, strategic deals, growing revenues, EPS and, in particular, driving the growth of the analytics business.

 

Actual Bonus Payments.

 

The table below sets out the 2016 incentive bonuses paid to our named executive officers in March 2017.

 

Name

Earned 2016
Incentive Bonus
($)

Rohit Kapoor  525,043   
Vishal Chhibbar          210,992    
Pavan Bagai  200,449 (1)
Rembert de Villa 341,543   
Nalin Miglani  231,104   

 

 

(1) The exchange rate used for the bonus conversion from Indian rupees to U.S. dollars for Mr. Bagai was 67.94, which was the exchange rate on December 31, 2016.

 

Long-Term Equity Incentives

 

Under our equity compensation program, our executive officers received restricted stock units under the 2015 Amendment and Restatement of the 2006 Omnibus Award Plan (the “2015 Plan”). We awarded restricted stock units to all of our named executive officers in the portions shown below.

 

(LOGO)  

 

The Time-Vested RSUs will vest in increments of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continuous service with the Company through the applicable vesting date.

 

The Committee believes these Time-Vested RSUs provide an important role in promoting retention of our executive officers.

 

35

 

 

The “Performance-Vested” portion of  the 2016 RSUs (“PRSUs”) are split into two types that each vest based on separate performance measures as follows:

 

  Revenue-Linked PRSUs:   50% of these performance-based restricted stock unit awards will cliff-vest on December 31 of the third fiscal year in the performance period, subject to achievement of threshold Company revenues against an annual revenue target for such third fiscal year and continuous employment through December 31, 2018 — we call these awards “Revenue-Linked PRSUs.”  The ultimate amount of Revenue-Linked PRSUs that a recipient earns may be up to 200% of the target award of Revenue-Linked RSUs.  The percentage of Revenue-Linked PRSUs earned will be determined based on straight-line interpolation to the extent the Company’s revenue falls in between 90% and 110%, as per the chart below:

 

Revenue Target Achievement

Funding Percentage

110% 200%
100% 100%
  90%     0%

 

  Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs:   The remaining 50% of the performance-based restricted stock unit awards cliff-vest on December 31 of the third fiscal year in the performance period, based on the achievement of relative total stockholder return performance of the Company against a peer group over the grant’s three-year performance period of January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 and continuous employment through December 31, 2018 — we call these awards “Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs.”  The Company’s TSR for the TSR performance period will be computed and then compared to the TSR of the companies in the TSR peer group, which is comprised of the public companies in our 8-digit Global Industry Classification Standard sub-industry group.  For the Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs granted in 2016, the Company included a negative TSR cap.  Under the negative TSR cap, if the total stockholder return is negative over the course of the three year performance period, no named executive officer may receive greater than 100% funding of the TSR-Linked PRSUs.
     
    The percentage of Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs earned will be determined based on straight-line interpolation to the extent the Company’s TSR falls in between the 20th and 80th percentiles, as per the chart below:

 

TSR Peer Group Percentile

Percentage of Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs Earned

80.0    200%
50.0   100%
20.0      0%

 

The Committee believes the PRSUs focus our executives on key drivers of our Company’s business that will ultimately lead to creation of additional stockholder value.

 

36

 

 

The table below shows the amount of Time-Vested and Performance-Vested RSUs our Compensation Committee awarded our named executive officers in 2016. In general, the Compensation Committee believes that the size of the award granted to an executive officer should increase based on the executive officer’s level of responsibility within the Company.

 

Name

Time Vested RSUs

Revenue-Linked PRSUs

Relative TSR-Linked
PRSUs

Rohit Kapoor 37,500 18,750 18,750
Vishal Chhibbar 7,000 3,500 3,500
Pavan Bagai 12,500 6,250 6,250
Rembert de Villa 6,000 3,000 3,000
Nalin Miglani 6,000 3,000 3,000

 

The Committee continues to believe that long-term equity awards provide employees with the incentive to stay with us for longer periods of time, which in turn, provides us with greater stability as we grow. These incentives foster the long-term perspective necessary for continued success in our business because the value of the awards is directly linked to long-term stock price performance, and they ensure that our executive officers are properly focused on stockholder value.

 

Moreover, the Committee favors restricted stock unit awards as these awards offer executives the opportunity to receive shares of our common stock on or shortly following the date that the restrictions lapse. Such awards serve both to reward and retain executives because value is linked to the price of our stock on the date that the restriction lapses, and the executive must generally remain in employment through the date that the restrictions lapse. Restricted stock unit awards provide a significant degree of alignment of interests between our executives and stockholders.

 

The Committee also believes that the mix between Time-Vested RSUs and Performance-Vested RSUs provides an appropriate balance between incentivizing our executives to continue their employment with the Company and to ensure they are focused on long-term financial performance and generating stockholder value, which will enable them to realize additional compensation.

 

Finally, restricted stock units are potentially less dilutive to stockholders’ equity than stock options because restricted stock awards are full value awards, and our Compensation Committee can award fewer shares than an equivalent value of stock options.

 

Benefits and Perquisites

 

We offer employee benefits coverage in order to:

 

provide our global workforce with a reasonable level of financial support in the event of illness or injury; and

 

provide market-competitive benefits that enhance productivity and job satisfaction through programs that focus on work/life balance.

 

The benefits available for all U.S. employees include customary medical and dental coverage, disability insurance and life insurance. In addition, our 401(k) plan provides a reasonable level of retirement income reflecting employees’ careers with us. A number of our U.S. employees, including our U.S.-based named executive officers, participate in these plans. The cost of employee benefits is partially borne by our employees, including our named

 

37

 

 

executive officers. Our named executive officer in India, Mr. Bagai, is eligible to participate in the Company’s pension benefit, health and welfare and fringe benefit plans otherwise available to executive employees in India.

 

We generally do not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to executive officers other than our Vice Chairman and CEO and our executive officers in India. Our Vice Chairman and CEO is provided a limited number of perquisites whose primary purpose is to minimize distractions from his attention to our important initiatives and to be competitive. A discussion of the benefits provided to our Vice Chairman and CEO is provided under “Employment Agreements” beginning on page 43.

 

Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits

 

Each named executive officer is party to an employment agreement or letter that sets forth the terms of his or her employment, including compensation, which was negotiated through arms’-length contract negotiations. Under these employment agreements or letters, we are obligated to pay severance or other enhanced benefits upon termination of their employment. A discussion of the severance and other enhanced benefits provided to our named executive officers is provided under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal 2016 Year-End” beginning on page 50.

 

We have provided change-in-control severance protection for some of our executive officers, including our named executive officers. Our Compensation Committee believes that such protection is intended to preserve employee morale and productivity and encourage retention in the face of the disruptive impact of an actual or rumored change in control. In addition, for executive officers, the program is intended to align executive officers’ and stockholders’ interests by enabling executive officers to consider corporate transactions that are in the best interests of our stockholders and other constituents without undue concern over whether the transactions may jeopardize the executive officers’ own employment.

 

Senior executive officers, including our named executive officers, have enhanced levels of benefits based on their job level, seniority and probable loss of employment after a change in control. We also consider it likely that it will take more time for senior executive officers to find new employment.

 

Looking Forward to 2017

 

For fiscal 2017, we generally continued the annual bonus program and our long-term equity incentives for fiscal 2016, subject, of course, to new performance goals.

 

Deductibility Cap on Executive Compensation

 

Our Compensation Committee’s general policy is that compensation should qualify as tax deductible to the Company for federal income tax purposes whenever possible, to the extent consistent with our overall compensation goals. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation paid to our named executive officers (other than our chief financial officer) in excess of $1 million per year is not deductible unless the compensation is “performance-based” as described in the regulations under Section 162(m). Compensation is generally “performance-based” if it is determined using pre-established objective formulas and criteria approved by stockholders within the past five years. Compensation awards under our 2015 Plan generally are designed to maximize tax deductibility by satisfying the performance-based compensation exception to Section 162(m). Changes in applicable tax laws and regulations as well as factors beyond the control of the Compensation Committee can adversely impact the deductibility of

 

38

 

 

compensation paid to our executive officers who are covered by Section 162(m). Our Compensation Committee believes that mathematical formulas cannot always anticipate and fairly address every situation that might arise. The Compensation Committee therefore retains the authority to adjust compensation in the case of unexpected, unusual or non-recurring events or to attract and retain key executive talent, even if this results in the payment of non-deductible compensation or to otherwise award or pay non-deductible compensation if the Committee deems it in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to do so.

 

Our Compensation Committee may make payments that are not fully deductible if, in its judgment, such payments are necessary to achieve our compensation objectives and to protect stockholder interests.

 

Compensation Committee Report

 

The Compensation Committee of the board of directors of ExlService Holdings, Inc. has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with our management and, based on such review and discussion, has recommended to the board of directors of ExlService Holdings, Inc. that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and our proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting.

 

  COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
   
  Ms. Anne Minto (Chair)
  Ms. Deborah Kerr
  Mr. Som Mittal
  Mr. Clyde W. Ostler
  Mr. Garen K. Staglin

 

39

 

  

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2016

 

The following table sets forth information for compensation earned in fiscal years 2014, 2015 and 2016 by our named executive officers: 

 

Name and
Principal Position

Year

Salary
($)

Bonus
($)

Stock
Awards
($) (3)

Non-Equity
Incentive

Plan
Compensation
($) (4)

Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($) (5)

All Other Compensation
($)

Total
($)

Rohit Kapoor  
Vice Chairman & CEO

2016

2015
2014

615,027
600,000

565,000

 


 

4,005,938
6,119,000

2,164,263

525,043
621,129

535,760


47,129
35,014

44,198

(6)

5,193,137
7,375,143

3,309,221

Vishal Chhibbar 
Executive Vice President and CFO

2016

2015
2014

411,054
251,341

250,272

(1)


 

 

747,775
595,800

415,549

210,992
157,049

130,457


8,340

8,066

108,340
34,775

35,879

(7)

1,478,161
1,047,305

840,222

Pavan Bagai  
President & Chief Operating Officer

2016

2015
2014

262,895
242,590

235,363

(2)


 

1,335,313
993,000

681,554

200,449
246,239

222,188

11,170  
9,386

9,010

72,453
76,164

84,938

(8)

1,882,280
1,567,379

1,233,053

Rembert de Villa 
Executive Vice President, Head of Healthcare

2016

2015
2014

407,514

—    

388,767

 



 

640,950 
—    

332,637 

341,543
—    

124,676


8,340
—    
8,250

(9)

1,398,347
—    
854,330

Nalin Miglani 
Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

2016

2015
2014

407,514

400,000

—    


 

640,950

476,640
—    

231,104

274,840
—    


8,340

81,520
—    

(10)

1,287,908

1,233,000
—    

 

 

(1) The amount set forth in the “Salary” column for Mr. Chhibbar includes $11,504 paid in 2016 in lieu of vacation not taken in 2015 in accordance with Indian employment regulations.

(2) The amount set forth in the “Salary” column for Mr. Bagai includes $116,297 of base salary, $102,773 of a cash supplementary allowance, $31,122 of housing allowance (which Mr. Bagai elected to receive in cash), and $12,703 of travel and medical allowance (which Mr. Bagai elected to receive in cash).

(3) Amounts reflect the total grant date fair value of awards recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (disregarding any forfeiture assumptions). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included (i) for 2016, in footnotes 2 and 18 to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, included in the 2016 Form 10-K; (ii) for 2015, in footnotes 2 and 14 to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2016; and (iii) for 2014, in footnotes 2 and 14 to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2015. With respect to stock awards granted in 2016, the table below sets forth the value attributable to performance restricted stock units valued at target achievement. Performance restricted stock units granted in 2016 may pay out up to 200% of the target award, which would have amounted to the grant date fair values listed as the maximum total grant date fair value for each named executive officer in the table below.

 

40

 

 

Name

Target Total Grant Date Fair Value ($)

Maximum Total Grant Date Fair Value ($)

Rohit Kapoor 2,184,563    4,369,125
Vishal Chhibbar 407,785 815,570
Pavan Bagai 728,188 1,456,375
Rembert de Villa 349,530 699,060
Nalin Miglani 349,530 699,060

 

 

(4) Reflects the cash incentive bonuses earned in respect of 2016 and paid in 2017. For details on our annual incentive bonus program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Incentive Bonus” beginning on page 32.

(5) Reflects the present value of accruals under the Gratuity Plan for Indian Employees. Information regarding our Gratuity Plan (including the assumptions used to calculate these amounts) may be found under “Pension Benefits for Fiscal Year 2016” beginning on page 50.

(6) Amount for Mr. Kapoor includes the travel allowance provided for under his employment agreement, to be used for once-a-year business class airfare for himself and his family between the United States and India ($31,378), costs associated with use of an automobile and driver in India, car lease, tax preparation assistance in India, contributions to our 401(k) plan, and Company-paid life insurance premiums.

(7) Amount for Mr. Chhibbar includes relocation assistance in connection with his move to the United States ($100,000), contributions to our 401(k) plan, and Company-paid life insurance premiums.

(8) Amount for Mr. Bagai includes housing allowance ($38,656), contributions to Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme (a statutorily required defined contribution program for Indian employees) ($13,956), costs associated with use of an automobile and driver in India, car lease, and home internet and telephone charges.

  (9) Amount for Mr. de Villa includes contributions to our 401(k) plan and Company-paid life insurance premiums.

(10)  Amount for Mr. Miglani includes contributions to our 401(k) plan and Company-paid life insurance premiums.

 

Unless otherwise specified, U.S. dollar figures in this proxy statement have been converted from Indian rupees at a rate of 67.94 Indian rupees to $1.00, the Indian rupee to U.S. dollar exchange rate in effect as of December 31, 2016. Some of the information in the Summary Compensation Tables for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 was converted using the exchange rates in effect as set forth below:

 

Fiscal Year

Rate

Exchange Rate of INR per US$1

2015 December 31, 2015 66.15
2014 December 31, 2014 63.03

 

41

 

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal Year 2016

 

The following table sets forth information concerning grants of stock and option awards and non-equity incentive plan awards granted to our named executive officers during fiscal year 2016:

 

   

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards (5)
($)

Name

 

 

 

Grant Date

Threshold
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

Threshold
(#)

Target
(#)

  Maximum(#)

Rohit Kapoor     615,027 1,230,055                
  2/24/2016         18,750 (2) 37,500        910,688  
  2/24/2016         18,750 (3) 37,500     1,273,875  
  2/24/2016               37,500 (4) 1,821,375  
                         
Vishal Chhibbar     240,000 480,000                
  2/24/2016         3,500 (2) 7,000     169,995  
  2/24/2016         3,500 (3) 7,000     237,790  
  2/24/2016               7,000 (4) 339,990  
                         
Pavan Bagai     249,234 498,469                
  2/24/2016         6,250 (2) 12,500     303,563  
  2/24/2016         6,250 (3) 12,500     424,625  
  2/24/2016               12,500 (4) 607,125  
                         
Rembert de Villa     305,635 611,270                
  2/24/2016         3,000 (2) 6,000     145,710  
  2/24/2016         3,000 (3) 6,000     203,820  
  2/24/2016               6,000 (4) 291,420  
                         
Nalin Miglani     244,508 489,016                
  2/24/2016         3,000 (2) 6,000     145,710  
  2/24/2016         3,000 (3) 6,000     203,820  
  2/24/2016               6,000 (4) 291,420  
                         

 

 

  (1) These amounts reflect the target and maximum cash incentive bonuses set for 2016. For details of our annual incentive bonus program, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Incentive Bonus” beginning on page 32.
  (2) Represents annual awards of Revenue-Linked PRSUs granted under the 2015 Plan, subject to the vesting set forth in footnote 6.
  (3) Represents annual awards of Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs granted under the 2015 Plan, subject to the vesting set forth in footnote 6.
  (4) Represents annual awards of restricted stock units granted under the 2015 Plan, subject to the vesting set forth in footnote 6.
  (5) The grant date fair value of the estimated future payouts for the Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs are based on the Monte Carlo value.
  (6) The vesting schedules of the stock grants mentioned in the table are as follows (subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date):

 

42  
 

 

Name

Grant Date

Vesting Start Date

Vesting Schedule

Rohit 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Revenue Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
Kapoor 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
  2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Restricted Stock Units : Vesting over 4 years – 25% each year
Vishal 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Revenue Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
Chhibbar 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
  2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Restricted Stock Units : Vesting over 4 years – 25% each year
Pavan 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Revenue Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
Bagai 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
  2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Restricted Stock Units : Vesting over 4 years – 25% each year
Rembert   2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Revenue Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
de Villa 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
  2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Restricted Stock Units : Vesting over 4 years – 25% each year
Nalin 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Revenue Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
  Miglani 2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs : 100% vesting on 12/31/2018
  2/24/2016 2/24/2016 Restricted Stock Units : Vesting over 4 years – 25% each year

 

Employment Agreements

 

In addition to the terms described below, the employment and severance agreements for each of our named executive officers include severance, termination and/or noncompetition provisions which are described below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal 2016 Year-End” beginning on page 50.

 

Rohit Kapoor

 

Mr. Kapoor serves as our Vice Chairman and CEO, and is based at our executive offices in New York, New York. We entered into an employment agreement with him, dated April 29, 2015. Mr. Kapoor’s employment agreement provides for an initial term that commenced January 1, 2015 and extends until December 31, 2017 and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless terminated with 120 days prior notice.

 

Salary, Bonus and Equity . Mr. Kapoor’s base salary was increased to $620,000, effective April 1, 2016. Mr. Kapoor’s base salary can be increased at our sole discretion and cannot be decreased unless a Company-wide decrease in pay is implemented. Mr. Kapoor can earn an annual cash bonus, with a target of 100% of base salary and a maximum of 200% of base salary, based upon the attainment of performance criteria determined by our Compensation Committee. Mr. Kapoor remains eligible to receive equity-based awards annually during the term, in amounts and forms determined by the Compensation Committee, but with vesting terms no less favorable than ratable vesting over four years from the date of grant.

 

Pursuant to the terms of our 2006 Omnibus Award Plan (the “2006 Plan”), Mr. Kapoor received a Stock Price Performance Award in the second quarter of 2015 that he may earn based on the Company’s average stock price exceeding certain targets during the 60 day period prior to December 31, 2017 and contingent upon his continuous service through that date. The amount of PRUSs Mr. Kapoor ultimately receives may be between 0% and 200% of his Target Award, based on actual performance.

 

Personal Benefits

 

We provide Mr. Kapoor with certain personal benefits, including certain club memberships, term life insurance policy (with a face value of $500,000), once-a-year business class airfare between the United States and India for the executive and his family, up to $12,000

 

43  
 

 

for personal tax and estate planning expenses, up to $1,400 per month car allowance, up to $12,000 per year for expenses associated with maintaining an automobile in India (including cost of a driver), personal security for the executive and his family while in India, reimbursement for first-class business travel, and a per diem allowance for certain trips. In addition, his employment agreement entitles him to certain other benefits in the event he is relocated to India, but which are not applicable currently as he maintains a U.S. residency.

 

Vishal Chhibbar

 

Mr. Chhibbar serves as our Executive Vice President and CFO, and was based in India until December 31, 2015. We entered into an employment agreement with him, effective January 1, 2016 which will continue throughout Mr. Chhibbar’s employment with the Company.

 

Salary, Bonus and Equity . Mr. Chhibbar’s base salary was increased to $400,000, effective January 1, 2016. Mr. Chhibbar’s base salary will be reviewed at least annually and may be increased at the discretion of the Board. In addition, under his agreement, Mr. Chhibbar can earn an annual cash bonus, with a target of 60% of base salary and a maximum of 120% of base salary, based upon the attainment of performance criteria determined by our Compensation Committee. Mr. Chhibbar is also eligible, subject to performance and other conditions, to receive annual equity awards at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Chhibbar was entitled to receive $100,000 in connection with his relocation from India to New York, New York in 2016.

 

Pavan Bagai

 

Mr. Bagai serves as our President and Chief Operating Officer, and is based in India. We entered into an employment agreement with him, effective July 31, 2002 and a severance letter, effective March 15, 2011, each of which will continue throughout Mr. Bagai’s employment with the Company.

 

Salary, Bonus and Equity . Mr. Bagai’s annual fixed compensation, measured in his home currency of Indian rupees, was increased by 7.98% effective April 1, 2016. Mr. Bagai’s annual fixed compensation includes base salary, as well as amounts available as a leave travel allowance, a housing allowance, an automobile allowance, a medical allowance and a cash supplementary allowance. In addition, Mr. Bagai can earn an annual cash bonus, with a target of 75% of annual fixed compensation and a maximum of 150% of annual fixed compensation in 2016, based upon the attainment of performance criteria determined by our Compensation Committee. Mr. Bagai is also eligible, subject to performance and other conditions, to receive annual equity awards at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

 

Rembert de Villa

 

Mr. de Villa serves as our Executive Vice President and Head of Healthcare and is based at our executive offices in New York, New York. We entered into an offer letter with him, effective as of March 20, 2008, and severance protection letter agreement, effective as of March 15, 2011.

 

Salary, Bonus and Equity . Mr. de Villa’s base salary was increased from $400,000 to $410,000 ( i.e. , by 2.5%), effective April 1, 2016. Mr. de Villa can earn an annual cash bonus, with a target of 75% of base salary and a maximum of 150% of base salary in 2016, based upon the attainment of criteria determined by our Compensation Committee. Mr. de Villa is also eligible, subject to performance and other conditions, to receive annual equity awards at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

 

44  
 

 

Nalin Miglani

 

Mr. Miglani serves as our Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, and is based at our executive offices in New York, New York. We entered into an employment agreement with him, effective December 1, 2014, which will continue throughout Mr. Miglani’s employment with the Company.

 

Salary, Bonus and Equity . Mr. Miglani’s base salary was increased from $400,000 to $410,000 ( i.e. , by 2.5%), effective April 1, 2016 and may be further increased from time to time by our Board. While employed, Mr. Miglani can earn an annual cash bonus, with a target of 60% of base salary and a maximum of 120% of base salary, based upon attainment of performance criteria determined by our Compensation Committee. Mr. Miglani is also eligible, subject to performance and other conditions, to receive annual equity awards at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Miglani’s employment agreement provided for: (i) an initial equity award of 20,000 restricted stock units that will vest according to the schedule described below under “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2016 Year-End” beginning on page 46 and (ii) a one-time joining bonus of $200,000 half of which was paid on the commencement of his employment and the other half paid in March 2015, based on his continued service with the Company. Mr. Miglani received $100,000 in connection with his relocation from Amsterdam to New York in 2014.

 

Mr. Miglani’s employment agreement also includes severance, termination and noncompetition provisions which are described below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal 2016 Year-End” beginning on page 50.

 

45  
 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2016 Year-End

 

The following table sets forth the equity awards we have made to our named executive officers that were outstanding as of December 31, 2016:

 

 

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Option /
Stock
Award
Grant
Date

Number of

Securities

Underlying Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable (1)

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

Option
Exercise
Price ($)

Option Expiration
Date

Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested

(#) (2)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($) (4)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#) (3)

Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not Vested
($) (4)

Rohit 1/23/2008 50,000 16.96 1/23/2018        
Kapoor 2/10/2009 196,400 8.75 2/10/2019        
  2/3/2011 97,500 19.76 2/3/2021        
  2/7/2012 97,500 24.77 2/7/2022        
  2/8/2013         18,750 (a) 945,750    
  2/13/2014         18,750 (a) 945,750    
  2/13/2014         1,205 (b) 60,780    
  2/26/2015         28,125 (a) 1,418,625    
  2/26/2015         12,499 (c) 630,450 12,502 (e) 630,601
  2/26/2015             37,500 (f) 1,891,500
  4/29/2015             200,000 (g) 10,088,000
  2/24/2016         37,500 (a) 1,891,500    
  2/24/2016             18,750 (h) 945,750
  2/24/2016             18,750 (h) 945,750
Vishal 6/1/2009 48,000 9.59 6/1/2019        
Chhibbar 2/7/2012 2,050 24.77 2/7/2022        
  2/8/2013         4,800 (d) 242,112    
  2/13/2014         4,900 (d) 247,156    
  2/13/2014         376 (b) 18,965    
  2/26/2015         6,750 (d) 340,470    
  2/26/2015         2,499 (c) 126,050 2,502 (e) 126,201
  2/26/2015             7,500 (f) 378,300
  2/24/2016         7,000 (a) 353,080    
  2/24/2016             3,500 (h) 176,540
  2/24/2016             3,500 (h) 176,540
Pavan 2/8/2013         9,200 (d) 464,048    
Bagai 2/13/2014         8,050 (d) 406,042    
  2/13/2014         602 (b) 30,365    
  2/26/2015         11,250 (d) 567,450    
  2/26/2015         4,166 (c) 210,133 4,168 (e) 210,234
  2/26/2015             12,500 (f) 630,500
  2/24/2016         12,500 (a) 630,500    
  2/24/2016             6,250 (h) 315,250
  2/24/2016             6,250 (h) 315,250

 

46  
 

 

 

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Option /
Stock
Award
Grant
Date

Number of

Securities

Underlying Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable (1)

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

Option
Exercise
Price ($)

Option Expiration
Date

Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested

(#) (2)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($) (4)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#) (3)

Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not Vested
($) (4)

Rembert 4/24/2008 40,000 23.82 4/24/2018        
de Villa 2/10/2009 25,000 8.75 2/10/2019        
  2/3/2011 11,050 19.76 2/3/2021        
  2/7/2012 9,750 24.77 2/7/2022        
  2/8/2013         3,600 (d) 181,584    
  2/13/2014         3,500 (d) 176,540    
  2/13/2014         734 (b) 37,023    
  2/26/2015         5,400 (d) 272,376    
  2/26/2015         1,999 (c) 100,830 2,002 (e) 100,981
  2/26/2015             6,000 (f) 302,640
  2/24/2016         6,000 (a) 302,640    
  2/24/2016             3,000 (h) 151,320
  2/24/2016             3,000 (h) 151,320
Nalin   12/4/2014         14,000 (d) 706,160    
Miglani 2/26/2015         5,400 (d) 272,376    
  2/26/2015         1,999 (c) 100,830 2,002 (e) 100,981
  2/26/2015             6,000 (f) 302,640
  2/24/2016         6,000 (a) 302,640    
  2/24/2016             3,000 (h) 151,320
  2/24/2016             3,000 (h) 151,320

 

 

(1) The stock option awards for Mr. Kapoor became vested in increments of 25% on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, generally subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date. For the stock option awards for each of the named executive officers other than Mr. Kapoor, 10% of the options vested on the first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 20% of the options vested on the second anniversary of the grant date, an additional 30% of the options vested on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 40% of the options vested on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, generally subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date.

(2) The restricted stock unit awards in this table vest and convert to shares in accordance with the following schedules (generally subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date):

(a) 25% of the restricted stock units vest on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

(b) 33.33% of the restricted stock units vest on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

(c) 100% of the 2015 Revenue-Linked PRSUs vest on December 31, 2017. This amount represents the first two tranches of the 2015 Revenue-Linked PRSUs that were banked based on performance during the 2015 and 2016 fiscal years.

(d) 10% of the restricted stock units vest on the first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 20% of the options vest on the second anniversary of the grant date, an additional 30% of the options vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 40% of the options vest on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.

 

47  
 

 

(3) The performance restricted stock unit awards in this table vest and convert to shares in accordance with the following schedules (generally subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date and achievement of applicable performance goals):

(e) 100% of the restricted stock units vest on December 31, 2017. This amount represents the third and final tranche of the 2015 Revenue-Linked PRSUs and reflects maximum performance.

(f) 100% of the restricted stock units vest on December 31, 2017. This amount represents the 2015 Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs and reflects maximum performance.

(g) 100% of the restricted stock units vest on December 31, 2017. This amount represents Mr. Kapoor’s Stock Price Performance Award and reflects maximum performance.

(h) 100% of the restricted stock units vest on December 31, 2018. This amount represents 2016 performance-based PRSUs and reflects target performance.

(4) The price used in determining the market values set forth in this table is $50.44, which was the closing price of our stock on December 30, 2016.

 

48  
 

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2016

 

The following table provides additional information about the value realized by our named executive officers on option award exercises and stock award vesting during fiscal year 2016:

 

 

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)

Value Realized
on Exercise
($)

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)

Value Realized on
Vesting
($)

Rohit Kapoor

500

49,500

50,000

1,717

30,000

14,714

3,569

50,000

11,136

37,803

1,061

16,183

1,599,098

1,665,250

61,099

1,108,650

552,879

134,177

1,597,500

374,297

1,270,903

35,599

674

18,750

9,375

1,204

9,375

9,375

12,585

6,294

37,500

29,986

834,188

410,438

52,711

449,250

417,094

584,573

292,356

1,741,875

Vishal Chhibbar

2,700

3,600

2,750

4,500

2,209

 

70,784

113,544

92,510

131,535

94,788

 

297

1,400

375

750

1,700

3,600

2,349

1,175

7,000

13,214

61,292

16,418

35,940

75,633

160,164

109,111

54,579

325,150

Pavan Bagai

13,000

5,316

27,184

 

404,915

138,946

718,283

 

461

6,900

2,300

601

1,250

5,000

3,859

1,930

11,500

20,510

306,981

100,694

26,312

59,900

222,450

179,251

89,649

534,175

Rembert de Villa —     —    

564

2,700

1,000

734

600

1,500

1,677

840

5,000

25,092

120,123

43,780

32,135

28,752

66,735

77,897

39,018

232,250

Nalin Miglani —     —    

600

4,000

28,752

191,040

 

49  
 

 

Pension Benefits For Fiscal Year 2016

 

The following table discloses the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the named executive officers and the years of service credited to each named executive under the Gratuity Plan for Indian Employees as of December 31, 2016:

 

Name

Plan Name

Number of Years
Credited Service
(#) (2)

Present Value of Accumulated
Benefit ($)

Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)

Vishal Chhibbar (1) Gratuity Plan for Indian Employees  — 43,467
         
Pavan Bagai Gratuity Plan for Indian Employees  14 79,751

 

 

(1) Mr. Chhibbar is no longer accruing a benefit under the Gratuity Plan and received a distribution of his entire account balance as a result of his relocation from India to the United States.
(2) Consists of the number of years of service credited as of December 31, 2016 for the purpose of determining benefit service under the Gratuity Plan. Credited service is determined based on the completed years of continuous employment (rounded to the nearest whole number of years) with the Company since the executive’s date of hire.
(3) Liabilities with regard to the Gratuity Plans are determined by actuarial valuation using the projected unit credit method. Under this method, we determine our liability based upon the discounted value of salary increases until the date of separation arising from retirement, death, resignation or other termination of services. Critical assumptions used in measuring the plan expense and projected liability under the projected unit credit method include the discount rate, expected return on assets and the expected increase in the compensation rates. Details regarding the assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in footnote 2 to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 included in the 2016 Form 10-K.

 

We are required to provide all Indian employees with benefits under the Gratuity Plan, a defined benefit pension plan in India. Distributions from the Gratuity Plan are made in a single lump sum following retirement from the Company. An executive’s benefit under the Gratuity Plan is determined at any time as the executive’s annual base salary (determined based on the executive’s most recent monthly base salary) divided by 26, multiplied by 15, and the product multiplied by the executive’hs completed years of continuous service with the Company. An executive has a vested and nonforfeitable right to payment of his accrued Gratuity Plan benefit only after five years of service. The present value of Mr. Bagai’s accumulated benefits has been determined based on his monthly basic salary rates in effect on December 31, 2016, which is approximately $9,874.

 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control at Fiscal 2016 Year-End

 

The following tables summarize the amounts payable to each named executive officer upon a change in control or termination of his employment with us on December 31, 2016. In calculating potential payments for purposes of this disclosure, we have quantified our equity-based payments using the closing stock price on December 20, 2016, which was $50.44. Certain defined terms used in the employment agreements for our named executive officers are defined following the description of Mr. Miglani’s potential payments.

 

50  
 

 

Rohit Kapoor

 

Cash Severance . If Mr. Kapoor’s employment were terminated by us without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” (in each case, as described below) on December 31, 2016, he would have been entitled to cash severance consisting of:

 

●       continuation of his base salary for 24 months;

 

●       his actual bonus, if any, earned for the year of termination, determined as if he had been employed for the full year of termination, paid ratably over the remaining period of base salary payments;

 

●       any unpaid bonus amounts from prior periods;

 

●       any accrued but unpaid base salary and vacation days or unreimbursed expenses

 

●       costs of continued COBRA coverage under the Company’s group health plan on behalf of the executive and his eligible dependents (described in more detail below), until the earlier of (x) the 18-month anniversary of termination and (y) the date the executive becomes eligible to receive comparable benefits from a subsequent employer; and

 

●       continuation of life insurance coverage until the earlier of (x) the 18-month anniversary of termination and (y) the date the executive commences employment with a subsequent employer.

 

Change-in-Control Cash Severance . If Mr. Kapoor’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” (in each case, as described above) within 12 months following a “change in control” or in specific contemplation of a change in control, the executive will receive, in lieu of the cash severance described above, (1) a lump sum payment equal to 24 months of base salary and (2) his actual bonus, if any, earned for the year of termination, determined as if he had been employed for the full year of termination, paid ratably over the remaining period of base salary payments.

 

Death or Disability . If Mr. Kapoor’s employment terminates due to his death or is terminated by either the executive or us due to his disability, he (or his estate) will be entitled to a prorated portion of his projected bonus amount for the year of termination.

 

Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Provisions . Mr. Kapoor is subject to confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions at all times, as well as noncompetition and nonsolicitation restrictions during his employment and for one year thereafter.

 

Annual Equity Awards . If Mr. Kapoor’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Kapoor for good reason, Mr. Kapoor shall be treated as if he were still employed by the Company for a period of two years following the termination date. On a “change in control” (as defined in the 2006 Plan or 2015 Plan, as applicable), Mr. Kapoor’s outstanding annual equity awards will vest as described below:

 

Time-Vested RSUs : If a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, Mr. Kapoor’s Time-Vested RSUs will be advanced by one year. In addition, all of Mr. Kapoor’s outstanding Time-Vested RSUs will become fully vested if, following or in specific contemplation of a change in control, he is terminated without cause or, following a change in control, he voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason.

 

51  
 

 

Revenue-Linked PRSUs : If a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, 100% of target of Mr. Kapoor’s Revenue-Linked PRSUs will be deemed earned, will be subject to a three year installment vesting schedule and will be advanced by one year under such schedule. In addition, all of Mr. Kapoor’s outstanding Revenue-Linked PRSUs will become fully vested if, following or in specific contemplation of a change in control, he is terminated without cause or, following a change in control, he voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason.

 

  Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs : If a change in control occurs on or prior to the first anniversary of the grant date, 100% of target of Mr. Kapoor’s Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs will be deemed earned. If a change in control occurs after the first anniversary of the grant date, the performance period will be deemed to end on the date of the change in control and the Compensation Committee shall determine the number of earned Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs based on the TSR of the Company and the peer group as of such date. In either scenario, the Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs that are deemed earned will be subject to a three year installment vesting schedule and will be advanced by one year under such schedule. In addition, all of Mr. Kapoor’s outstanding Revenue-Linked PRSUs will become fully vested if, within 12 months following or in specific contemplation of a change in control, he is terminated without cause or, within 12 months following a change in control, he voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason. Furthermore, all of Mr. Kapoor’s outstanding, earned TSR-Linked PRSUs will become fully vested if, at any time following a change in control, he is terminated without cause or he voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason.

 

Stock Price Performance Award . Mr. Kapoor will vest in a portion of his Stock Price Performance Award representing his service from January 1, 2015 through his termination date plus an additional year (the “Enhanced Pro-Rata Portion”) if his employment terminates prior to a change in control due to his death or disability. If, prior to a change in control, Mr. Kapoor is terminated by the Company without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, a portion of the award will be considered earned based on the Company’s average stock price during the 60 days prior to Mr. Kapoor’s termination date (the “Earned PRSUs”). An Enhanced Pro-Rata Portion of any such Earned PRSUs will vest immediately upon Mr. Kapoor’s termination date.

 

If a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, a portion of the PRSUs outstanding as of the date of the change of control will be deemed earned and convert to Time-Vested RSUs (“CIC PRSUs”), based on the Company’s average stock price on the date of the change in control, that cliff-vest on December 31, 2017, contingent upon Mr. Kapoor’s continued employment through that date. One hundred percent of all PRSUs granted to Mr. Kapoor pursuant to the Stock Price Performance Award will become fully vested if (i) within 12 months following or in specific contemplation of a change in control, he is terminated without cause; (ii) within 12 months following a change in control, he terminates his employment for good reason or (iii) there is a failure to substitute, assume, exchange or otherwise continue the PRSUs by an acquirer. In addition, following the 12-month period described above, an Enhanced Pro-Rata Portion of any earned CIC PRSUs will vest immediately upon Mr. Kapoor’s termination of employment at any time after a change in control due to his termination without cause, death or disability, or resignation for good reason. 

 

52  
 

 

Release of Claims . Mr. Kapoor’s severance payments and termination-related equity acceleration are subject to his execution of a release of claims against us, his not having committed a material breach of the restrictive covenants that has remained uncured for 15 days after we have given him notice of such breach and his resignation from the board of directors and all committees thereof, if requested by the Company.

 

Code Section 280G . Mr. Kapoor’s employment agreement also contains a “modified cut-back” provision such that any payments that constitute “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code will be reduced to an amount that does not trigger the applicable excise taxes, to the extent such reduced amount is larger than the amount Mr. Kapoor would have received on a present-value net-after-tax basis (including excise taxes) absent such a reduction.

 

Indicative Payouts for Rohit Kapoor

 

Payments upon
Termination

 

Death or
Disability
($)

 

Termination for Good
Reason or Without
Cause
($)

 

Change
in
Control
($)

 

Termination Without Cause or for Good
Reason Following Change in Control or
Termination Without Cause in Specific
Contemplation of Change in Control
($)

Base salary payout     1,240,000         1,240,000      
Bonus payout      525,043   525,043         525,043      
Life insurance     4,595         4,595      
Health insurance     24,916         24,916      
Restricted stock units     3,843,780      2,425,155   5,262,405      
Performance restricted stock  units     3,783,000 (1)   4,098,351   4,728,750     
Stock Price Performance Award   5,044,000   10,088,000         — (2)   10,088,000 (3)  

 

 

(1) As described above, upon his termination for good reason or without cause, Mr. Kapoor is treated as having continued his employment for two additional years for purposes of his annual equity awards. The information in this table was calculated assuming target performance over the additional two year-period, however, the actual payment would depend upon the Company’s actual performance following Mr. Kapoor’s termination.

 

(2) Mr. Kapoor’s Stock Price Performance Award becomes immediately vested upon a change in control if the Compensation Committee has not made a provision for the substitution, assumption, exchange or other continuation of the award in connection with the change in control.

 

(3) In addition, Mr. Kapoor would have received a payout valued at $10,088,000 pursuant to the terms of his Stock Price Performance Award if he had been terminated on December 31, 2016 due to his death or disability following a change in control.

 

Vishal Chhibbar

 

Either Mr. Chhibbar or we may terminate Mr. Chhibbar’s employment at any time (though we must give Mr. Chhibbar 30 days’ notice if the termination is without “cause” and Mr. Chhibbar must give us 90 days’ advance notice upon any resignation). If Mr. Chhibbar’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Chhibbar for “good reason,” as summarized below, Mr. Chhibbar will receive a cash severance payment equal to 12 months base salary, with 25% payable as a lump sum payment and the remaining 75% payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices.

 

53  

 

 

On a “change in control” (as defined in the 2006 Plan or 2015 Plan, as applicable), Mr. Chhibbar’s outstanding equity awards will vest as described below:

 

Time-Vested RSUs : If a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, Mr. Chhibbar’s Time-Vested RSUs will be advanced by one year. In addition, all of Mr. Chhibbar’s outstanding Time-Vested RSUs will become fully vested if, following or in specific contemplation of a change in control, he is terminated without cause or, following a change in control, he terminates his employment for good reason.

 

Revenue-Linked PRSUs : If a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, 100% of Mr. Chhibbar’s Revenue-Linked PRSUs will be deemed earned, will be subject to a new three year installment vesting schedule and will be advanced by one year under such schedule. In addition, all of Mr. Chhibbar’s outstanding Revenue-Linked PRSUs will become fully vested if, following or in specific contemplation of a change in control, he is terminated without cause or, following a change in control, he terminates his employment for good reason.

 

Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs : If a change in control occurs on or prior to the first anniversary of the grant date, 100% of Mr. Chhibbar’s Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs will be deemed earned. If a change in control occurs after the first anniversary of the grant date, the performance period will be deemed to end on the date of the change in control and the Compensation Committee shall determine the number of earned Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs based on the TSR of the Company and the peer group as of such date. In either scenario, the Relative TSR-Linked PRSUs that are deemed earned will be subject to a new three year installment vesting schedule and will be advanced by one year under such schedule. In addition, all of Mr. Chhibbar’s outstanding, earned TSR-Linked PRSUs will become fully vested if, following or in specific contemplation of a change in control, he is terminated without cause or, following a change in control, he voluntarily terminates his employment for good reason.

 

Mr. Chhibbar’s severance payments and termination-related equity acceleration are subject to his execution of a release of claims against us. Mr. Chhibbar is subject to confidentiality restrictions at all times, as well as noncompetition, nondisparagement and nonsolicitation restrictions during his employment and for one year thereafter.

 

Indicative Payouts of Vishal Chhibbar

 

Payments upon
Termination

Termination for
Good Reason or
Without Cause
($)

Change in Control
($)

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason
Following Change in Control or Termination Without
Cause in Specific Contemplation of Change in Control
($)

Base salary payout 400,000 400,000
Restricted stock units 530,931 1,201,783
Performance restricted stock units 802,803 920,530

 

54  

 

 

Pavan Bagai

 

Either Mr. Bagai or we may terminate Mr. Bagai’s employment at any time with three months’ notice (or pay three months’ salary in lieu of notice). If Mr. Bagai is terminated by us without “cause” (other than due to disability) at any time following a change in control or in specific contemplation of a change in control, or if Mr. Bagai resigns for “good reason” following a “change in control” (as defined in the 2015 Plan), Mr. Bagai will receive a cash severance payment equal to twelve months’ of his then-current annual fixed compensation, payable in twelve equal monthly installments.

 

On a “change in control” (as defined in the 2006 Plan or 2015 Plan, as applicable), Mr. Bagai’s outstanding equity awards will vest in the same manner as described for Mr. Chhibbar’s outstanding equity awards on page 54.

 

Mr. Bagai’s severance payments and termination-related equity acceleration are subject to his execution of a waiver and release of claims against us. Mr. Bagai is subject to confidentiality restrictions at all times, as well as noncompetition and nonsolicitation restrictions for two years following termination of his employment.

 

Indicative Payouts for Pavan Bagai

 

Payments upon
Termination

Death or Disability
($)

Termination for
Good Reason or
Without Cause
($)

Change in Control
($)

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason
Following Change in Control or Termination Without
Cause in Specific Contemplation of Change in Control
($)

Base salary payout 338,534 338,534
Restricted stock units    952,156 2,098,405
Performance restricted stock units 1,366,117 1,576,250
Government-required payouts (1) 79,751   79,751 79,751

 

 

(1) Represents distributions under the Gratuity Plan, which is due to Mr. Bagai because he has earned over five years of credited service.

 

Rembert de Villa

 

Either Mr. de Villa or we may terminate Mr. de Villa’s employment at any time. If we terminate Mr. de Villa’s employment without “cause,” Mr. de Villa will receive a cash severance payment equal to three months of base salary, payable in accordance with our regular payroll practices. If Mr. de Villa is terminated by us without “cause” at any time following a “change in control” (as defined in the 2006 Plan) or in specific contemplation of a change in control, or if Mr. de Villa resigns for “good reason” after six months following a change in control, Mr. de Villa will receive (a) a one-time lump sum severance payment equal to three months of his then-current base salary and (b) beginning on the three-month anniversary of his termination, payment of his then-current base salary for nine months through our regular payroll practices. Beginning three months after his termination, Mr. de Villa is required to actively seek comparable employment, and upon subsequent employment, we will reduce his continued salary payments by any base salary Mr. de Villa receives from another employer during such severance period.

 

On a “change in control” (as defined in the 2006 Plan or 2015 Plan, as applicable), Mr. de Villa’s outstanding equity awards will vest in the same manner as described for Mr. Chhibbar’s outstanding equity awards on page 54.

 

55  

 

 

Mr. de Villa’s severance payments and termination-related equity acceleration are subject to his execution of a release of claims against us. Mr. de Villa is subject to confidentiality restrictions at all times, as well as noncompetition and nonsolicitation restrictions for one year following termination of his employment.

 

Indicative Payouts for Rembert de Villa

 

Payments upon
Termination

Termination
Without Cause
($)

Change in
Control
($)

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason
Following Change in Control or Termination Without
Cause in Specific Contemplation of Change in Control
($)

Base salary payout 102,500 410,000
Restricted stock units 430,455 970,163
Performance restricted stock units 655,720 756,600

 

Nalin Miglani

 

Either Mr. Miglani or we may terminate Mr. Miglani’s employment at any time (though we must give Mr. Miglani 30 days’ notice if the termination is without “cause” and Mr. Miglani must give us 90 days’ advance notice upon any resignation). If Mr. Miglani’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without “cause” (other than due to death or disability) or by Mr. Miglani for “good reason” (both “cause” and “good reason” as defined above), Mr. Miglani will receive a cash severance payment equal to 12 months base salary, with 25% payable as a lump sum payment and the remaining 75% payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices.

 

On a “change in control” (as defined in the 2006 Plan or 2015 Plan, as applicable), Mr. Miglani’s outstanding equity awards will vest in the same manner as described for Mr. Chhibbar’s outstanding equity awards on page 54.

 

Mr. Miglani’s severance payments and termination-related equity acceleration are subject to his execution of a release of claims against us. Mr. Miglani is subject to confidentiality restrictions at all times, as well as noncompetition, nondisparagement and nonsolicitation restrictions during his employment and for one year thereafter.

 

Indicative Payouts for Nalin Miglani

 

Payments upon
Termination

Termination for
Good Reason or
Without Cause
($)

Change in
Control
($)

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason
Following Change in Control or Termination Without
Cause in Specific Contemplation of Change in Control
($)

Base salary payout 410,000 410,000   
Restricted stock units 438,828 1,281,176   
Performance restricted stock units 655,720 756,600   

 

Certain Defined Terms

 

Definition of Cause

 

The following definition of “cause” applies to Messrs. Kapoor, Chhibbar, Bagai, de Villa and Miglani unless stated otherwise. “Cause” will occur if: (i) there is a final nonappealable conviction of, or pleading of no contest to, (1) a crime of moral turpitude which causes serious economic injury or serious injury to our reputation or (2) a felony; (ii) the executive engages in

 

  56

 

 

fraud, embezzlement, gross negligence, self-dealing, dishonesty or other gross and willful misconduct which causes serious and demonstrable injury to us; (iii) the executive materially violates any of our material policies; (iv) the executive willfully and continually fails to substantially perform his duties (other than for reason of physical or mental incapacity) which continues beyond 15 days after we notify him in writing of his need to substantially improve his performance; provided that a failure to achieve performance objectives will not by itself constitute cause and no act or failure to act shall be considered “willful” unless done or failed to be done by the executive in bad faith and without a reasonable belief that his actions or omission was in our best interest; (v) the executive fails to reasonably cooperate in a governmental investigation involving us; (vi) the executive materially, knowingly and intentionally fails to comply with applicable laws with respect to the execution of the Company’s business operations (subject to a presumption of good faith if the executive is following advice of counsel); (vii) the executive fails to follow his supervisor’s (or, for Messrs. Kapoor and Bagai, or for Mr. de Villa following a Change in Control, our board of directors’) lawful instructions and does not remedy the failure for 15 days after we give him written notice; (viii) the executive’s use of alcohol or drugs materially interferes with the performance of his duties; (ix) for Mr. Kapoor only, he fails to take reasonable steps to end certain affiliations specified in his employment agreement within six months after a request by our board of directors; or (x) for Mr. Kapoor only, he materially breaches any material term of his employment agreement which is not remedied within 15 days of receipt of notice from the Company specifying the breach in reasonable detail.

 

Definition of Good Reason

 

For Mr. Kapoor, “good reason” generally means: (i) his duties or responsibilities are substantially reduced, he is required to report to anyone other than our board of directors, or his title as our officer is adversely changed; however, if following a change in control, his new title and authority are similar to his old title and authority, then any change in the executive’s title will not constitute a significant reduction in his duties and authorities; (ii) his base salary is reduced (other than in connection with a Company-wide decrease in pay), or his target annual bonus opportunity is reduced below 100% of his base salary; (iii) the office or location where he is based in the metropolitan New York City area is moved more than 30 miles, and the new location is more than 30 miles from his primary residence in the metropolitan New York City area; or (iv) we breach any material term of his employment agreement. If Mr. Kapoor plans to terminate his employment for good reason, he must notify us within 45 days following the date the executive first becomes aware of the circumstances giving rise to good reason and must allow us 30 days to remedy the problem.

 

The following definition of “good reason” applies to Messrs. Chhibbar, Bagai, de Villa and Miglani unless stated otherwise. “Good reason” means, without the executive’s prior written consent: (i) the executive’s duties or responsibilities are substantially reduced, or he is required to report to anyone other than our board of directors, or our CEO (or in the case of Mr. de Villa, our President, or the Executive Vice President/Managing Director, Global Client Services); (ii) the executive’s title as our officer is adversely changed; however, if following a change in control (as defined in the 2015 Plan), his new title and authority are similar to his old title and authority, then any change in the executive’s title will not constitute a significant reduction in his duties and authorities; (iii) for Messrs. de Villa and Bagai only, the executive’s base salary or annual cash bonus opportunity is reduced, other than in connection with a proportionate reduction impacting all members of our executive committee; (iv) for Messrs. Chhibbar and Miglani only, there is a change in the office or location where the executive is based of more than 50 miles and such new office or location is more than 50 miles from the executive’s primary residence; or (v) we breach any material term of the executive’s employment agreement or severance

 

  57

 

 

agreement. If the executive plans to terminate his employment for good reason, he must notify us within 30 days following the date the executive first becomes aware of the circumstances giving rise to good reason and must allow us 30 days to remedy the problem.

 

Definition of Change in Control

 

A “change in control” (as generally defined in Mr. Kapoor’s employment agreement, the 2006 Plan and the 2015 Plan, as applicable) generally means any of the following events: (i) any person or group becomes a beneficial owner (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than 50% (50% or more in the 2006 Plan) of either (1) the combined voting power of our then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote in the election of directors or (2) our outstanding shares of common stock, assuming all rights to acquire common stock through options, warrants, conversion of convertible stock or debt, and the like are exercised; (ii) a majority of the members of our board of directors changes from those in office as of the date of Mr. Kapoor’s employment agreement or the effective date of the 2006 or 2015 Plan (as applicable), except that the election of any new director whose election or nomination was approved by at least two-thirds of our incumbent directors will not be regarded towards a change in the majority for these purposes; (iii) our dissolution or liquidation; (iv) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our business or our assets; or (v) consummation of a reorganization, recapitalization, merger, consolidation or similar transaction with another entity which requires the approval of our stockholders; however, any such transaction will not be a change in control if after the transaction (1) more than 50% of the total voting power of the resulting entity or its ultimate parent is represented by what were our outstanding voting securities before the transaction in substantially the same proportion among holders; (2) no person or group is or becomes the beneficial owner of more than 50% (50% or more in the 2006 Plan) of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities eligible to elect members of our board of directors of the parent or surviving company; and (3) at least a majority of the members of our board of directors of the parent or surviving company following the transaction were our board members when our board first approved the transaction.

 

  58

 

 

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2016

 

The following table sets forth information for compensation earned in fiscal year 2016 by our non-executive directors who served during fiscal year 2016:

 

Name (1)

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)

Stock
Awards
($) (2)(3)

Option
Awards
($)

All Other
Compensation
($) (5)

Total ($)

David Kelso 92,500 100,024 192,524
Deborah Kerr 82,500 100,024 182,524
Clyde Ostler 95,000 100,024 195,024
Anne Minto 90,000 100,024 28,742 (4) 218,766
Som Mittal 80,000 100,024 15,519 (4) 195,543
Nitin Sahney 82,500 145,881 228,381
Garen Staglin 130,000   200,039 43,645 (5) 373,684

 

 

(1) Mr. Kapoor’s compensation during 2016 was based solely on his role as CEO, as disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2016” beginning on page 40 and discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 23. He does not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director.
(2) Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards and option awards recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (disregarding any forfeiture assumptions). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in footnotes 2 and 18 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 included in the 2016 Form 10-K.
(3) The outstanding equity awards held by our directors on December 31, 2016 is set forth on the table below:

Name

No. of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#) Exercisable

No. of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options (#)
Unexercisable

No. of Shares or Units of
Stock That Have Not
Vested

David Kelso 38,253 1,946
Deborah Kerr 1,946
Anne Minto   3,093 1,946
Som Mittal 1,946
Clyde Ostler 62,723 1,946
Nitin Sahney 2,992
Garen Staglin 32,723 4,174
(4) For Ms. Minto and Mr. Mittal, amount reflects our reimbursement to the director for tax planning fees. The amount also reflects a subsequent payment made to Ms. Minto and Mr. Mittal to gross up the reimbursement of tax planning fees so that the economic benefit to the director was the same as if such benefit were provided on a non-taxable basis ($9,300 and $4,755, respectively).
(5) For Mr. Staglin, amount reflects our reimbursement for costs associated with secretarial services ($42,250) and telephone charges ($1,395).

 

For 2016, non-employee directors were eligible to receive an annual retainer fee in the amount of $60,000. The non-executive Chairman of our board of directors was eligible to receive an additional retainer of $150,000 which is paid $50,000 in cash and $100,000 in equity. New non-employee directors who join our board of directors during a calendar quarter are eligible to receive the full fee for such calendar quarter. The chairperson of our Audit Committee was eligible to receive an additional annual fee of $25,000, and other members of our Audit Committee were eligible to receive an additional annual fee of $12,500. The Chairpersons of committees other than our Audit Committee were eligible to receive an additional annual fee of $20,000, and members of committees other than our Audit Committee were eligible to

 

  59

 

 

receive an additional annual fee of $10,000. There are no additional fees payable for attendance at our board or committee meetings (whether in person, telephonic or otherwise). We make quarterly cash payments to our directors who elect to receive a portion of their director fees in the form of cash.

 

Holders of restricted stock units do not receive the underlying shares of common stock until the units have vested and are settled. The restricted stock units issued to each of our non-employee directors will settle on the earliest of:

 

such director’s death;

 

180 days following the end of such director’s term on our board of directors, or if the director has satisfied our stock ownership guidelines and made an election prior to the grant, the vesting date of the award; and

 

the occurrence of a “change in control,” as defined in the 2006 Plan or 2015 Plan, as applicable, that satisfies the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

 

Risk and Compensation Policies

 

Our Compensation Committee has taken into account its discussions with management regarding our compensation practices and has concluded that any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

 

  60

 

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

 

Unless otherwise indicated, the table below sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

 

each of our directors and each of our named executive officers individually;

 

each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; and

 

all of our current directors and current executive officers (i.e., not just named executive officers) as a group.

 

The amounts and percentages of common stock beneficially owned below are as of March 31, 2017 (the “Determination Date”), and are reported on the basis of the regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of the Determination Date. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities. Except as otherwise indicated below, each of the persons named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities beneficially owned by such person as set forth opposite such person’s name.

 

   

Beneficial Ownership

 

Vested but
Unsettled Restricted
Stock Units (3)

   

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)

 

Shares

 

Percentage
(%) (2)

   

Total

5% Beneficial Owners                
Blackrock Inc. (4)   3,689,149   10.92    —      3,689,149
FMR LLC (5)   3,560,022   10.53   —      3,560,022
Vanguard Group, Inc. (6)   2,752,412   8.14    —      2,752,412
Wellington Management Group LLP (7)   2,037,425   6.03    —      2,037,425
NEOs and Directors                
Pavan Bagai   125,581   *   —      125,581
Rembert de Villa (8)   97,397   *   —      97,397
Vishal Chhibbar (9)   64,025   *   —      64,025
Nalin Miglani   —        *   —      —    
Rohit Kapoor (10)   1,534,074   4.48    —      1,534,074
David B. Kelso (11)   43,253   *   38,061   81,314
Deborah Kerr   —       *   4,470    4,470
Anne E. Minto (12)   3,093   *   11,621    14,714
Som Mittal   —       *   8,874    8,874
Clyde W. Ostler (13)   62,723   *   28,788    91,511
Nitin Sahney   —       *   1,046    1,046
Garen K. Staglin (14)   55,769   *   45,468    101,237
All current directors and current executive officers as a group (15 persons) (15)   2,003,085   5.80%   138,328   2,141,413

 

 

* Less than 1%.

 

61

 

 

(1) Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each beneficial owner is c/o ExlService Holdings, Inc., 280 Park Avenue, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10017.
(2) Based on 33,796,135 shares outstanding as of the Determination Date.
(3) For non-management directors, this column includes restricted stock units (previously granted for service on the Board) that have vested but are unsettled. Because vested restricted stock units generally settle 180 days following the director’s term of service (see “Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2016” for additional details on settlement), the units are not treated as beneficially owned under SEC rules because the holder does not have the right to acquire the underlying stock within 60 days of the Determination Date.  Restricted stock units that are vested but unsettled count towards our stock ownership policy for non-employee directors, which requires directors to maintain stock ownership of at least five times their respective annual retainers.
(4) Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on January 12, 2017, BlackRock, Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 3,620,458 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,689,149 shares. The business address of Blackrock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022.
(5) Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2017, FMR LLC had sole voting power with respect to 1,320,751 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,560,022 shares. The business address of FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.  
(6) Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 2017, Vanguard Group, Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 64,756 shares, shared voting power with respect to 4,834 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 2,684,388 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 68,024 shares. The business address of Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355.
(7) Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 2017, Wellington Management Group LLP had shared voting power with respect to 1,765,775 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,037,425 shares. The business address of the combined filers is c/o Wellington Management Company, LLP, 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.  
(8) This amount includes 85,800 shares of our common stock of which Mr. de Villa has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of the Determination Date pursuant to currently vested and exercisable stock options.
(9) This amount includes 48,000 shares of our common stock of which Mr. Chhibbar has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of the Determination Date pursuant to currently vested and exercisable stock options.
(10) Mr. Kapoor had sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 374,136 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 718,538 shares. The amount reported in the table above includes 177,134 shares of our common stock owned indirectly by Mr. Kapoor through a family trust created in 2016 under a 2005 grantor-retained annuity trust, for which Mr. Kapoor’s spouse and Mr. Kapoor’s brother are the co-trustees and share dispositive and voting control over the shares in the trust, and 40,219 shares of our common stock owned indirectly by Mr. Kapoor through a family trust created in 2016 under a 2013